TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child enteric protozoan infections in rural Bangladesh
T2 - A cluster-randomized controlled trial
AU - Lin, Audrie
AU - Ercumen, Ayse
AU - Benjamin-Chung, Jade
AU - Arnold, Benjamin F.
AU - Das, Shimul
AU - Haque, Rashidul
AU - Ashraf, Sania
AU - Parvez, Sarker M.
AU - Unicomb, Leanne
AU - Rahman, Mahbubur
AU - Hubbard, Alan E.
AU - Stewart, Christine P.
AU - Colford, John M.
AU - Luby, Stephen P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
PY - 2018/10/30
Y1 - 2018/10/30
N2 - Background We evaluated effects of individual and combined water, sanitation, handwashing (WSH), and nutritional interventions on protozoan infections in children. Methods We randomized geographical clusters of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh into chlorinated drinking water, hygienic sanitation, handwashing, nutrition, combined WSH, nutrition plus WSH (N+WSH), or control arms. Participants were not masked. After approximately 2.5 years of intervention, we measured Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and Entamoeba histolytica prevalence and infection intensity by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction of child stool. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results Between May 2012 and July 2013, we randomized 5551 pregnant women. At follow-up, among 4102 available women, we enrolled 6694 children into the protozoan assessment. We analyzed stool from 5933 children (aged ∼31 months) for protozoan infections. Compared with 35.5% prevalence among controls, Giardia infection prevalence was lower in the sanitation (26.5%; prevalence ratio [PR], 0.75 [95% confidence interval {CI},.64-.88]), handwashing (28.2%; PR, 0.80 [95% CI,.66-.96]), WSH (29.7%; PR, 0.83 [95% CI,.72-.96]), and N+WSH (26.7%; PR, 0.75 [95% CI,.64-.88]) arms. Water and nutrition interventions had no effect. Low prevalence of E. histolytica and Cryptosporidium (<2%) resulted in imprecise effect estimates. Conclusions Individual handwashing and hygienic sanitation interventions significantly reduced childhood Giardia infections, and there were no effects of chlorinated drinking water and nutrition improvements in this context. Combined WSH interventions provided no additional benefit. To reduce Giardia infection, individual WSH interventions may be more feasible and cost-effective than combined interventions in similar rural, low-income settings.
AB - Background We evaluated effects of individual and combined water, sanitation, handwashing (WSH), and nutritional interventions on protozoan infections in children. Methods We randomized geographical clusters of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh into chlorinated drinking water, hygienic sanitation, handwashing, nutrition, combined WSH, nutrition plus WSH (N+WSH), or control arms. Participants were not masked. After approximately 2.5 years of intervention, we measured Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and Entamoeba histolytica prevalence and infection intensity by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction of child stool. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results Between May 2012 and July 2013, we randomized 5551 pregnant women. At follow-up, among 4102 available women, we enrolled 6694 children into the protozoan assessment. We analyzed stool from 5933 children (aged ∼31 months) for protozoan infections. Compared with 35.5% prevalence among controls, Giardia infection prevalence was lower in the sanitation (26.5%; prevalence ratio [PR], 0.75 [95% confidence interval {CI},.64-.88]), handwashing (28.2%; PR, 0.80 [95% CI,.66-.96]), WSH (29.7%; PR, 0.83 [95% CI,.72-.96]), and N+WSH (26.7%; PR, 0.75 [95% CI,.64-.88]) arms. Water and nutrition interventions had no effect. Low prevalence of E. histolytica and Cryptosporidium (<2%) resulted in imprecise effect estimates. Conclusions Individual handwashing and hygienic sanitation interventions significantly reduced childhood Giardia infections, and there were no effects of chlorinated drinking water and nutrition improvements in this context. Combined WSH interventions provided no additional benefit. To reduce Giardia infection, individual WSH interventions may be more feasible and cost-effective than combined interventions in similar rural, low-income settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046817319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046817319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cid/ciy320
DO - 10.1093/cid/ciy320
M3 - Article
C2 - 29669039
AN - SCOPUS:85046817319
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 67
SP - 1515
EP - 1522
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 10
ER -