Electromyographic and kinetic analysis of two abdominal muscle performance tests

Douglas E. Haladay, Craig R. Denegar, Sayers J. Miller, John Challis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In order to accurately assess the abdominal muscles, clinicians need valid clinical measures. The double leg lowering test (DLLT) and lower abdominal muscle progression (LAMP) are two common tests of abdominal muscle performance. The purposes of this study were to determine the relation between surface electromyographic (EMG) activity during the DLLT and LAMP levels; hip joint resultant moments and DLLT and LAMP levels; and the two measures of DLLT and LAMP. Methods: Ten healthy participants were tested under both conditions. Surface EMG activity of the abdominal muscles was obtained, while pelvic movement was detected simultaneously. Results: A moderate to strong association was found between rectus abdominus muscle activity and a moderate association with the external obliques with both test levels. For the internal oblique/transversus abdominus, a moderate and weak association was found with the DLLT and LAMP, respectively. A very strong association existed between the hip resultant joint moments (RJM) and the DLLT, while there was a weak correlation between hip RJM and the LAMP. No significant correlation was found between the DLLT and LAMP grades. Conclusions: This finding suggests that these tests may measure different qualities of muscle performance and provides preliminary support for their use. Further evaluation of these assessments with clinical populations is necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-593
Number of pages7
JournalPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 17 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electromyographic and kinetic analysis of two abdominal muscle performance tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this