Abstract
Electron spin resonance and capacitance vs. voltage measurements are used to evaluate the radiation response of Unibond buried oxides. When damaged by hole injection, it is found that Unibond® buried oxides exhibit a rough correspondence between E1 centers and positive charge as well as generation of Pb centers at the Unibond® buried oxide/Si interface. In these respects, Unibond® buried oxides qualitatively resemble thermal SiO2. However, a hydrogen complexed E' center known as the 74 G doublet is also detected in the Unibond® buried oxides. This defect is not detectable in thermal SiO2 under similar circumstances. Since the presence of 74 G doublet center is generally indicative of very high hydrogen content and since hydrogen is clearly a significant participant in radiation damage, this result suggests a qualitative difference between the radiation response of Unibond® and thermal SiO2. Unibond® results are also compared and contrasted with similar investigations on separation-by-implanted-oxygen (SIMOX) buried oxides. Although the charge trapping response of Unibond® buried oxides may be inferior to that of radiation hardened thermal SiU2, it appears to be more simple and superior to that of SIMOX buried oxides.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2635-2638 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 6 PART 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1996 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Electron spin resonance characterization of trapping centers in unibond® buried oxides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver