TY - JOUR
T1 - ELECTRONIC SOURCES AS INPUT TO GRE® READING COMPREHENSION ITEM DEVELOPMENT
T2 - SOURCEFINDER PROTOTYPE EVALUATION
AU - Passonneau, Rebecca
AU - Hemat, Lisa
AU - Plante, Jan
AU - Sheehan, Kathleen M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2002 Educational Testing Service.
PY - 2002/6
Y1 - 2002/6
N2 - This evaluation study compares the performance of a prototype tool called SourceFinder against the performance of highly trained human test developers. SourceFinder — a specialized search engine developed to locate source material for Graduate Record Examinations (GRE®) reading comprehension passages — employs a variety of shallow linguistic features to model the search criteria employed by expert test developers, to automate the source selection process, and to reduce source-processing time. The current evaluation provides detailed information about the aspects of source variation that are not well modeled by the current prototype. Approaches for enhancing performance in identified areas are discussed. The present study also provides a more explicit description of the source selection task, and a rich data set for developing a less subjective, more explicit definition of the types of documents preferred by test developers.
AB - This evaluation study compares the performance of a prototype tool called SourceFinder against the performance of highly trained human test developers. SourceFinder — a specialized search engine developed to locate source material for Graduate Record Examinations (GRE®) reading comprehension passages — employs a variety of shallow linguistic features to model the search criteria employed by expert test developers, to automate the source selection process, and to reduce source-processing time. The current evaluation provides detailed information about the aspects of source variation that are not well modeled by the current prototype. Approaches for enhancing performance in identified areas are discussed. The present study also provides a more explicit description of the source selection task, and a rich data set for developing a less subjective, more explicit definition of the types of documents preferred by test developers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164514657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164514657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2002.tb01879.x
DO - 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2002.tb01879.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164514657
SN - 2330-8516
VL - 2002
SP - i-59
JO - ETS Research Report Series
JF - ETS Research Report Series
IS - 1
ER -