Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Eliciting Legal Status Through Social Media Surveys Among Immigrants—Evidence from a List Experiment, Direct Question and Stepwise Exclusion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Estimating the size of the undocumented migrant population remains a critical challenge for researchers and policymakers. This study assesses the viability of using social media platforms, specifically Facebook and Instagram, to recruit a survey sample of migrants and elicit their status. The research focuses on Mexican and Venezuelan immigrants in Texas, Florida, Illinois, and California. Three methods for eliciting legal status are tested: direct questions, indirect sequential questions (stepwise exclusion), and a list experiment. The study (N = 2,027) finds that while social media recruitment is cost-effective and rapid, it faces challenges such as selection bias, misclassification, and platform-imposed restrictions. The list experiment suggests the presence of response bias in traditional surveys to sensitive legal status questions. Estimates of the share of undocumented migrants deviate considerably from available reference estimates. We argue that social media surveys are best applied in preparation for traditional surveys rather than in their place.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSociological Methods and Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eliciting Legal Status Through Social Media Surveys Among Immigrants—Evidence from a List Experiment, Direct Question and Stepwise Exclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this