TY - JOUR
T1 - Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure
T2 - Unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women)
AU - Hess, Connie N.
AU - Rao, Sunil V.
AU - Kong, David F.
AU - Aberle, Laura H.
AU - Anstrom, Kevin J.
AU - Gibson, C. Michael
AU - Gilchrist, Ian
AU - Jacobs, Alice K.
AU - Jolly, Sanjit S.
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Messenger, John C.
AU - Newby, L. Kristin
AU - Waksman, Ron
AU - Krucoff, Mitchell W.
N1 - Funding Information:
SAFE-PCI for Women receives unrestricted funding from multiple industry sponsors (Terumo Medical, Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Medtronic Vascular, The Medicines Company, Lilly USA, Guerbet, and ACIST Medical Systems) and the FDA Office of Women's Health. The NCRI activity was funded by the National Institutes of Health. As a public health initiative, experts from all funding sources were all actively involved in considerations for the final study design but had no role in study conduct, operations, data management, or analysis. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, the drafting and editing of the manuscript, and its final contents.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Women are at higher risk than men for bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared with femoral access, radial access reduces these complications but may be more challenging in women because of higher rates of radial artery spasm, tortuosity, and occlusion as well as lower rates of procedure success. Whether the safety advantages of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing PCI are outweighed by reduced effectiveness has not been studied. The Study of Access site For Enhancement of PCI for Women is a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing radial with femoral arterial access in women undergoing PCI. In conjunction with the US Food and Drug Administration's Critical Path Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, this study embeds the randomized clinical trial into the existing infrastructure of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ CathPCI Registry™ through the National Institute of Health's National Cardiovascular Research Infrastructure. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, or 5) or vascular complication requiring intervention occurring at 72 hours after PCI or by hospital discharge. The primary feasibility end point is procedure success. Secondary end points include procedure duration, contrast volume, radiation dose, quality of life, and a composite of 30-day death, vascular complication, or unplanned revascularization.
AB - Women are at higher risk than men for bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared with femoral access, radial access reduces these complications but may be more challenging in women because of higher rates of radial artery spasm, tortuosity, and occlusion as well as lower rates of procedure success. Whether the safety advantages of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing PCI are outweighed by reduced effectiveness has not been studied. The Study of Access site For Enhancement of PCI for Women is a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing radial with femoral arterial access in women undergoing PCI. In conjunction with the US Food and Drug Administration's Critical Path Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, this study embeds the randomized clinical trial into the existing infrastructure of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ CathPCI Registry™ through the National Institute of Health's National Cardiovascular Research Infrastructure. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, or 5) or vascular complication requiring intervention occurring at 72 hours after PCI or by hospital discharge. The primary feasibility end point is procedure success. Secondary end points include procedure duration, contrast volume, radiation dose, quality of life, and a composite of 30-day death, vascular complication, or unplanned revascularization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883766112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883766112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 24016489
AN - SCOPUS:84883766112
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 166
SP - 421-428.e1
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 3
ER -