Emergency department-initiated palliative care screening among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

  • Dimitri E. Lin
  • , Satheesh Gunaga
  • , Fabrice I. Mowbray
  • , Eric D. Isaacs
  • , Daniel Markwalter
  • , Naomi George
  • , Alison E. Hay
  • , Rita Manfredi
  • , Erica Westlake
  • , Murtaza Akhter
  • , Jason K. Bowman
  • , Naomi Rebollo-Lee
  • , Brian Gacioch
  • , Alexander D. Ginsburg
  • , Justin Kenneth Brooten
  • , Sarah Pajka
  • , Katie Selman
  • , Paul Bain
  • , Joshua J. Davis
  • , Shan Liu
  • Kei Ouchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction The rapidly growing population of older adults (individuals aged 65 years and older) presents a new set of challenges for healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED), given the prevalence of severe and life-threatening conditions among this group, such as chronic cancer, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia and congestive heart failure. ED encounters often represent a critical point in an older patient’s trajectory of care and can thus be an important opportunity for various interventions such as palliative care consultation. Therefore, identifying those who will benefit most from palliative care is of high importance, especially in determining the course of future treatment. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review assessing the efficacy of palliative care screening in the ED by assessing inpatient length of stay as the primary outcome and quality of life, percentage of hospitalisation and cost of care as secondary outcomes. Methods This study will use Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane as databases. The study population comprises adults aged 60 years and older, with no focus on any specific clinical specialty or disease. Patients who have not received palliative care screening will serve as the comparator. Only studies with an applicable comparator will be considered. Studies published from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2025 will be included. All articles will be reviewed independently and in duplicate, and every author will participate in the review, data abstraction and conflict resolution process. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere095894
JournalBMJ open
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 21 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency department-initiated palliative care screening among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this