TY - GEN
T1 - EMPATHIC ABILITY VS. USER SATISFACTION
T2 - ASME 2023 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC-CIE 2023
AU - Johnson, Erin
AU - Letting, Cynthia
AU - Soria Zurita, Nicolás F.
AU - Menold, Jessica
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 by ASME.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Prior work has identified the importance of empathy and the effect on design outcomes such as increased quality, originality, and usability. The measurement of empathy in the context of design, however, remains a pervasive issue. While several studies have proposed interventions, tools or methods to enhance designers’ empathy, it remains unclear how managers or designers can practically measure empathic abilities. Many of the existing methods are either incredibly time-consuming and thus not feasible in design practice or are not grounded in design work, making the translation and interpretation of instruments or surveys challenging. To address this gap, we study preference accuracy as a measure of empathic ability, and investigate its relationship with design outcomes, specifically user satisfaction. We review a case study implementing this method; fourteen participants were recruited and randomly paired with a partner. Individuals were tasked with designing a chair to meet their partner’s needs. Each participant interviewed their partner and completed two preference assessments: one detailing their own design preferences, and one detailing their perceptions of their partner’s design preferences. To calculate preference accuracy, the preference assessments for each participant were compared. Results from this study suggest preference accuracy may not be linked with user satisfaction, but may be a useful tool to differentiate empathic abilities across a population of designers.
AB - Prior work has identified the importance of empathy and the effect on design outcomes such as increased quality, originality, and usability. The measurement of empathy in the context of design, however, remains a pervasive issue. While several studies have proposed interventions, tools or methods to enhance designers’ empathy, it remains unclear how managers or designers can practically measure empathic abilities. Many of the existing methods are either incredibly time-consuming and thus not feasible in design practice or are not grounded in design work, making the translation and interpretation of instruments or surveys challenging. To address this gap, we study preference accuracy as a measure of empathic ability, and investigate its relationship with design outcomes, specifically user satisfaction. We review a case study implementing this method; fourteen participants were recruited and randomly paired with a partner. Individuals were tasked with designing a chair to meet their partner’s needs. Each participant interviewed their partner and completed two preference assessments: one detailing their own design preferences, and one detailing their perceptions of their partner’s design preferences. To calculate preference accuracy, the preference assessments for each participant were compared. Results from this study suggest preference accuracy may not be linked with user satisfaction, but may be a useful tool to differentiate empathic abilities across a population of designers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178501518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178501518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/detc2023-116943
DO - 10.1115/detc2023-116943
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85178501518
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
BT - 35th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Y2 - 20 August 2023 through 23 August 2023
ER -