TY - JOUR
T1 - Employment adequacy in extractive industries
T2 - An analysis of underemployment, 1974–1998
AU - Slack, Tim
AU - Jensen, Leif
N1 - Funding Information:
Support for this research was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (NRICGP 98-35401-6157), by The Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Experiment Station Project 3501, and by the Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, which has core support from the National Institute on Child Health and Human Development (1 R24 HD1025). The authors thank W. J. Grigsby, A. E. Luloff, and Richard C. Stedman, as well as the editor and anonymous reviewers of Society and Natural Resources for comments on previous drafts of this manuscript. The authors alone are responsible for any substantive or analytic errors.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004/2/1
Y1 - 2004/2/1
N2 - Marginal employment stands as a major obstacle to the economic health of American families and communities. This is particularly true among those who work in extractive industries. We conceptualize marginal employment as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Survey from 1974 through 1998, we find that workers in extractive industries face far higher rates of underemployment than do those employed in other major industrial sectors. However, this aggregation masks great intracategory heterogeneity. The high rates of underemployment observed in extractive industries are largely a driven by the disadvantages of those employed in agriculture and forestry/fishing. In contrast, those employed in mining enjoy substantially lower rates of underemployment. The relative employment circumstances found in each industry are only partly explained by conventional predictors of underemployment.
AB - Marginal employment stands as a major obstacle to the economic health of American families and communities. This is particularly true among those who work in extractive industries. We conceptualize marginal employment as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Survey from 1974 through 1998, we find that workers in extractive industries face far higher rates of underemployment than do those employed in other major industrial sectors. However, this aggregation masks great intracategory heterogeneity. The high rates of underemployment observed in extractive industries are largely a driven by the disadvantages of those employed in agriculture and forestry/fishing. In contrast, those employed in mining enjoy substantially lower rates of underemployment. The relative employment circumstances found in each industry are only partly explained by conventional predictors of underemployment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342290336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1342290336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08941920490261258
DO - 10.1080/08941920490261258
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:1342290336
SN - 0894-1920
VL - 17
SP - 129
EP - 146
JO - Society and Natural Resources
JF - Society and Natural Resources
IS - 2
ER -