TY - JOUR
T1 - Enablers of Six Sigma
T2 - contextual framework and its empirical validation
AU - Dubey, Rameshwar
AU - Gunasekaran, Angappa
AU - Childe, Stephen J.
AU - Fosso Wamba, Samuel
AU - Papadopoulos, Thanos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - The aim of the paper is to identify the enablers for the successful implementation of Six Sigma. None of the existing frameworks provides any clear understanding related to linkages between, and hierarchical relationships among, the constructs of Six Sigma implementation. Our study has both inductive and deductive elements. We identified enablers of Six Sigma implementation from existing research, and we developed a contextual framework using the interpretive structural modelling technique. We further studied enablers based on their driving power and dependence using MICMAC analysis to categorise the enablers into four clusters. In order to validate the ISM model statistically we developed and pre-tested a structured questionnaire before using it for a survey. Data were collected using a split survey method using a modified version of Dillman's total design method. We performed non-response bias before checking assumptions such as constant variance and normality. We further checked the reliability and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis. We find that constructs and indicators of our theoretical framework meet the criteria, and find them to be a good fit based on confirmatory factor analysis. We draw conclusions based on statistical analyses and our study limitations, and suggest further research directions.
AB - The aim of the paper is to identify the enablers for the successful implementation of Six Sigma. None of the existing frameworks provides any clear understanding related to linkages between, and hierarchical relationships among, the constructs of Six Sigma implementation. Our study has both inductive and deductive elements. We identified enablers of Six Sigma implementation from existing research, and we developed a contextual framework using the interpretive structural modelling technique. We further studied enablers based on their driving power and dependence using MICMAC analysis to categorise the enablers into four clusters. In order to validate the ISM model statistically we developed and pre-tested a structured questionnaire before using it for a survey. Data were collected using a split survey method using a modified version of Dillman's total design method. We performed non-response bias before checking assumptions such as constant variance and normality. We further checked the reliability and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis. We find that constructs and indicators of our theoretical framework meet the criteria, and find them to be a good fit based on confirmatory factor analysis. We draw conclusions based on statistical analyses and our study limitations, and suggest further research directions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939833293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939833293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14783363.2015.1075877
DO - 10.1080/14783363.2015.1075877
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939833293
SN - 1478-3363
VL - 27
SP - 1346
EP - 1372
JO - Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
JF - Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
IS - 11-12
ER -