Abstract
Translating written curricular materials into rich, complex, learning environments is an undertheorized area in science education. This study examines two critical cases of teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum focused on the development of complex reasoning around biodiversity for fifth graders. Two elements emerged that significantly impact teacher enactment - their conceptions of authenticity (authentic learning/authentic science) and their view of science (descriptive/inferential). The results suggest that disentangling the common conflation of these two elements supports a broader definition of inquiry science teaching that is more sensitive to context and individual teacher enactment.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 973-993 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Science Education |
Volume | 92 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2008 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
- History and Philosophy of Science