TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy efficacy analysis of a mechanical shaker insweet cherry harvesting
AU - He, Long
AU - Zhou, Jianfeng
AU - Du, Xiaoqiang
AU - Chen, Du
AU - Zhang, Qin
AU - Karkee, Manoj
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by Washington State University Agricultural Research Center federal formula funds (Project No. WNP0728 and WNP0745) received from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institutes for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) and by the USDA Special Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) program (Project No. 2009-02259). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Washington State University.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - To obtain the baseline information for designing a high efficiency mechanical sweet cherry harvester, a series of dynamic and harvesting tests were conducted in orchards. In the dynamic test, a mechanical shaker was used to shake branches of target trees. Three trees were randomly selected for the study and each studied branch of the tested trees was divided into three response zones where one accelerometer was mounted on each zone to record the response to the input excitations. The kinetic energy induced by the input excitation in each response zone was tracked during the course of energy delivery. Results from these dynamic response tests showed that the kinetic energy delivered to an excited branch on average accounted for 60%, 77%, 92% and 95% of input excitation energy at shaking frequency of 6, 10, 14, and 18Hz, respectively. Harvesting tests were also conducted using shaking frequencies of 14 and 18Hz, and test trees were shaken using a sequence of four 5s long intermittent excitations. On average, the shaker removed 67±16% of the fruit during the first cycle of 18Hz shaking, and 42±16% with 14Hz shaking. The shaker energy efficacy, defined as the percentage fruit removal per kilo-joule of input energy, was 6.9±2.2%kJ-1 and 7.4±1.3%kJ-1 during the first cycle of 14 and 18Hz shaking, respectively. The results indicated that the 18Hz shaking frequency reached higher fruit removal efficiency when compared to the 14Hz shaking frequency with similar energy efficacy.
AB - To obtain the baseline information for designing a high efficiency mechanical sweet cherry harvester, a series of dynamic and harvesting tests were conducted in orchards. In the dynamic test, a mechanical shaker was used to shake branches of target trees. Three trees were randomly selected for the study and each studied branch of the tested trees was divided into three response zones where one accelerometer was mounted on each zone to record the response to the input excitations. The kinetic energy induced by the input excitation in each response zone was tracked during the course of energy delivery. Results from these dynamic response tests showed that the kinetic energy delivered to an excited branch on average accounted for 60%, 77%, 92% and 95% of input excitation energy at shaking frequency of 6, 10, 14, and 18Hz, respectively. Harvesting tests were also conducted using shaking frequencies of 14 and 18Hz, and test trees were shaken using a sequence of four 5s long intermittent excitations. On average, the shaker removed 67±16% of the fruit during the first cycle of 18Hz shaking, and 42±16% with 14Hz shaking. The shaker energy efficacy, defined as the percentage fruit removal per kilo-joule of input energy, was 6.9±2.2%kJ-1 and 7.4±1.3%kJ-1 during the first cycle of 14 and 18Hz shaking, respectively. The results indicated that the 18Hz shaking frequency reached higher fruit removal efficiency when compared to the 14Hz shaking frequency with similar energy efficacy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885441203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885441203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.08.013
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.08.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84885441203
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 116
SP - 309
EP - 315
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
IS - 4
ER -