Enhancing veterinary systematic and scoping reviews reporting for better identification and dissemination in VetSRev

Elisa Martello; Lisa D. Morrow; Heather K. Moberly; Douglas J.C. Grindlay; Marnie L. Brennan

doi:10.18849/ve.v10i4.721

Enhancing veterinary systematic and scoping reviews reporting for better identification and dissemination in VetSRev

Elisa Martello
, Lisa D. Morrow
, Heather K. Moberly
, Douglas J.C. Grindlay
, Marnie L. Brennan

University Libraries - University Park

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Veterinary medicine advances rapidly, generating extensive amounts of research. Systematic and scoping reviews synthesise evidence to help guide clinical decisions, improve welfare, influence policy, and shape research priorities. Unlike narrative reviews, they employ transparent, rigorous methods. This commentary presents insights from curating VetSRev, a more than a decade-old, freely accessible repository containing an interactive list of published veterinary systematic and scoping reviews. Accessible, high-quality reviews strengthen public and owner trust, improve animal welfare, and promote evidence-based practice. Following established protocols and guidelines ensures quality, visibility, and VetSRev inclusion, thereby disseminating the reviews to users, advancing knowledge, informing research priorities, and enhancing clinical decision-making in veterinary medicine.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-6
Number of pages	6
Journal	Veterinary Evidence
Volume	10
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i4.721
State	Published - Jan 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Veterinary

Access to Document

10.18849/ve.v10i4.721

Cite this

@article{2a70f75c09644fba967c3898d5191ebb,

title = "Enhancing veterinary systematic and scoping reviews reporting for better identification and dissemination in VetSRev",

abstract = "Veterinary medicine advances rapidly, generating extensive amounts of research. Systematic and scoping reviews synthesise evidence to help guide clinical decisions, improve welfare, influence policy, and shape research priorities. Unlike narrative reviews, they employ transparent, rigorous methods. This commentary presents insights from curating VetSRev, a more than a decade-old, freely accessible repository containing an interactive list of published veterinary systematic and scoping reviews. Accessible, high-quality reviews strengthen public and owner trust, improve animal welfare, and promote evidence-based practice. Following established protocols and guidelines ensures quality, visibility, and VetSRev inclusion, thereby disseminating the reviews to users, advancing knowledge, informing research priorities, and enhancing clinical decision-making in veterinary medicine.",

author = "Elisa Martello and Morrow, \{Lisa D.\} and Moberly, \{Heather K.\} and Grindlay, \{Douglas J.C.\} and Brennan, \{Marnie L.\}",

year = "2025",

month = jan,

doi = "10.18849/ve.v10i4.721",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "1--6",

journal = "Veterinary Evidence",

issn = "2396-9776",

publisher = "Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing veterinary systematic and scoping reviews reporting for better identification and dissemination in VetSRev

AU - Martello, Elisa

AU - Morrow, Lisa D.

AU - Moberly, Heather K.

AU - Grindlay, Douglas J.C.

AU - Brennan, Marnie L.

PY - 2025/1

Y1 - 2025/1

N2 - Veterinary medicine advances rapidly, generating extensive amounts of research. Systematic and scoping reviews synthesise evidence to help guide clinical decisions, improve welfare, influence policy, and shape research priorities. Unlike narrative reviews, they employ transparent, rigorous methods. This commentary presents insights from curating VetSRev, a more than a decade-old, freely accessible repository containing an interactive list of published veterinary systematic and scoping reviews. Accessible, high-quality reviews strengthen public and owner trust, improve animal welfare, and promote evidence-based practice. Following established protocols and guidelines ensures quality, visibility, and VetSRev inclusion, thereby disseminating the reviews to users, advancing knowledge, informing research priorities, and enhancing clinical decision-making in veterinary medicine.

AB - Veterinary medicine advances rapidly, generating extensive amounts of research. Systematic and scoping reviews synthesise evidence to help guide clinical decisions, improve welfare, influence policy, and shape research priorities. Unlike narrative reviews, they employ transparent, rigorous methods. This commentary presents insights from curating VetSRev, a more than a decade-old, freely accessible repository containing an interactive list of published veterinary systematic and scoping reviews. Accessible, high-quality reviews strengthen public and owner trust, improve animal welfare, and promote evidence-based practice. Following established protocols and guidelines ensures quality, visibility, and VetSRev inclusion, thereby disseminating the reviews to users, advancing knowledge, informing research priorities, and enhancing clinical decision-making in veterinary medicine.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035253360

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035253360#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.18849/ve.v10i4.721

DO - 10.18849/ve.v10i4.721

M3 - Article

C2 - 42006383

AN - SCOPUS:105035253360

SN - 2396-9776

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Veterinary Evidence

JF - Veterinary Evidence

IS - 4

ER -

Enhancing veterinary systematic and scoping reviews reporting for better identification and dissemination in VetSRev

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this