Environmental Protection, Agency Motivations, and Rent Extraction: The Regulation of Water Pollution in Louisiana

Andrew N. Kleit, Meredtth A. Pierce, R. Carter Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Direct environmental regulation has been in place in the United States for more than twenty-five years. Yet there has been little study of what actually affects regulatory enforcement levels. This study examines enforcement issues by focusing on water quality enforcement by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. The study finds that penalties are more likely to occur, and are likely to be higher, the more serious a firm's violation of a regulation. Penalties are also more likely, and likely to be higher, if a firm has a previous record of environmental violations. In contrast to other studies, however, we do not find that enforcement varies across regional offices. In addition, we did not find any systematic effects of the Weingast and Moran (1983) theory of legislative dominance. We did, however, find evidence of rent extraction, along the lines of McChesney (1987; 1991).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-137
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Regulatory Economics
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental Protection, Agency Motivations, and Rent Extraction: The Regulation of Water Pollution in Louisiana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this