Abstract
In the last two decades it has become increasingly common to ad-vocate for a complete ban on the sale of cigarettes. One reason in favor of such a ban is egalitarian: differences in the prevalence of smoking between socioeconomic groups go a long way in explaining health inequality, and a complete ban might be effective in reducing this inequality. However, a complete ban might also be objectionable on egalitarian grounds if issued with a discriminatory intent or if it is selectively paternalistic. This article argues that a complete ban is likely to be guilty of both, especially when one of its aims is to reduce unequal rates of smoking between groups. A complete ban on the sale of cigarettes thus exhibits a curious feature: in aiming to reduce inequality it threatens to be inegalitarian. This is characteristic of a wider class of public health policies that deserves further attention by egalitarians.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-113 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health(social science)
- Health Policy
- History and Philosophy of Science