Erratum: A burst in a wind bubble and the impact on baryonic ejecta: High-energy gamma-ray flashes and afterglows from fast radio bursts and pulsar-driven supernova remnants (Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1328)

Kohta Murase, Kazumi Kashiyama, Peter Meszaros

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper 'A burst in a wind bubble and the impact on baryonic ejecta: high-energy gamma-ray flashes and afterglows from fast radio bursts and pulsar-driven supernova remnants' was published in MNRAS, 461, 1498 (2016). We noticed that descriptions on free-free absorption optical depths are not correct. In the text, it was said that the singly ionized state with Text = 105 K is used. But, for the calculation of free-free absorption optical depths in Figs 3 and A1 of the original paper, the fully ionized state with Text = 102.5 K was assumed. The formula used in the numerical code remains valid and the conclusions of Murase, Kashiyama &Meszáros (2016) do not change even with more realistic values. However, we here present additional plots, in which free-free optical depths are calculated with more realistic parameters. (Figure Presented).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3542-3543
Number of pages2
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume467
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: A burst in a wind bubble and the impact on baryonic ejecta: High-energy gamma-ray flashes and afterglows from fast radio bursts and pulsar-driven supernova remnants (Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1328)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this