Abstract
In the original OnlineFirst publication of this article, Figures 3–5 were incorrectly cited in the text and Figure 5 was omitted from the article. All versions have been updated to reflect the following changes. Under the heading ‘‘Policy Challenges,’’ the sentence reading ‘‘Figure 3a shows a comparison between Seattle’s more centralized and Minneapolis’ decentralized curb management structures’’ has been corrected to ‘‘Figure 3 shows a comparison between Seattle’s more centralized and Minneapolis’ decentralized curb management structures.’’ Under the heading ‘‘Current Trends and Solutions,’’ the sentence reading ‘‘Figure 3b shows the most common curb management strategies adopted by cities, and Figure 4 displays a map of those cities’’ has been corrected to ‘‘Figure 4 shows the most common curb management strategies adopted by cities, and Figure 5 displays a map of those cities.’’
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 841 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Transportation Research Record |
| Volume | 2676 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Feb 2022 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: "Curbspace Management Challenges and Opportunities from Public and Private Sector Perspectives" (Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 10.1177/03611981211027156)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver