Erratum to: Relative utility of agronomic, phenological, and morphological traits for assessing genotype-by-environment interaction in maize inbreds (Crop Science, (2020), 60, 1, (62-81), 10.1002/csc2.20035)

Celeste M. Falcon, Shawn M. Kaeppler, Edgar P. Spalding, Nathan D. Miller, Nicholas Haase, Naser AlKhalifah, Martin Bohn, Edward S. Buckler, Darwin A. Campbell, Ignacio Ciampitti, Lisa Coffey, Jode Edwards, David Ertl, Sherry Flint-Garcia, Michael A. Gore, Christopher Graham, Candice N. Hirsch, James B. Holland, Diego Jarquín, Joseph KnollNick Lauter, Carolyn J. Lawrence-Dill, Elizabeth C. Lee, Aaron Lorenz, Jonathan P. Lynch, Seth C. Murray, Rebecca Nelson, M. Cinta Romay, Torbert Rocheford, Patrick S. Schnable, Brian Scully, Margaret Smith, Nathan Springer, Mitchell R. Tuinstra, Renee Walton, Teclemariam Weldekidan, Randall J. Wisser, Wenwei Xu, Natalia de Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The published version of Supplemental Figures S2 and S3 were incorrect. The correct versions of Supplemental Figures S2 and S3 are below. S2 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE (Figure presented.) Boxplots of observed phenotypes by environment. Phenotypic values for 14 traits measured in up to 36 environments. Some traits were not measured in some environments or the data were not considered due to errors S3 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE (Figure presented.) Boxplots of observed phenotypes by genotype. Phenotypic values for 14 traits measured in up to 36 environments. Some traits were not measured in some environments or the data were not considered due to errors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2568-2569
Number of pages2
JournalCrop Science
Volume62
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Relative utility of agronomic, phenological, and morphological traits for assessing genotype-by-environment interaction in maize inbreds (Crop Science, (2020), 60, 1, (62-81), 10.1002/csc2.20035)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this