Abstract
The published version of Supplemental Figures S2 and S3 were incorrect. The correct versions of Supplemental Figures S2 and S3 are below. S2 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE (Figure presented.) Boxplots of observed phenotypes by environment. Phenotypic values for 14 traits measured in up to 36 environments. Some traits were not measured in some environments or the data were not considered due to errors S3 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE (Figure presented.) Boxplots of observed phenotypes by genotype. Phenotypic values for 14 traits measured in up to 36 environments. Some traits were not measured in some environments or the data were not considered due to errors.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2568-2569 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Crop Science |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Nov 1 2022 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Agronomy and Crop Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Relative utility of agronomic, phenological, and morphological traits for assessing genotype-by-environment interaction in maize inbreds (Crop Science, (2020), 60, 1, (62-81), 10.1002/csc2.20035)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver