TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing classification and hierarchy in populated place labeling for multiscale mapping for the National map
AU - Butzler, Stephen J.
AU - Brewer, Cynthia A.
AU - Stroh, Wesley J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks to Lou Yost, Jennifer Runyon, and members of the Domestic Names Committee of the Board on Geographic Names at the USGS for assistance and perspective on the current state of geographic naming. We appreciate the encouragement of Lynn Usery, Director of the USGS Center for Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS). The research is funded by a grant from CEGIS, announcement 09HQPA1000. The Gould Center and National Mapping Expertise Exchange program at Penn State provided facilities for the research.
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - Current standards for federal mapping call for use of the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) point layer for placement of United States populated place labels. However, this point layer contains limited classification information and hierarchy information, resulting in problems of map quality for database-driven, multi-scale, reference mapping, such as maps served by The National Map Viewer from USGS. Database-driven mapping often relies simply on what labels fit best in the map frame. Our research investigates alternative sources for labeling populated places, including polygons defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, such as incorporated place, census designated place (CDP), and economic place. Within each of these polygon layers we investigate relevant attributes from the decennial and economic censuses, such as population for incorporated places and CDPs, and the number of employees for economic places. The data selected are available for the entire country to serve national mapping requirements. This combination of data allows a more refined classification of populated places on maps that better represents relative importance. Visual importance on maps through scale should derive from more than simply residential population, but also economic importance, though comparison is made to this simpler case. We differentiate a fourth category of GNIS populated place points, essentially "neighborhoods" and related features-which are not incorporated places, CDPs, nor economic places. Populated places in this fourth class do not have federally defined boundaries, necessitating an alternative method for determining hierarchy in label presentation through scale.
AB - Current standards for federal mapping call for use of the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) point layer for placement of United States populated place labels. However, this point layer contains limited classification information and hierarchy information, resulting in problems of map quality for database-driven, multi-scale, reference mapping, such as maps served by The National Map Viewer from USGS. Database-driven mapping often relies simply on what labels fit best in the map frame. Our research investigates alternative sources for labeling populated places, including polygons defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, such as incorporated place, census designated place (CDP), and economic place. Within each of these polygon layers we investigate relevant attributes from the decennial and economic censuses, such as population for incorporated places and CDPs, and the number of employees for economic places. The data selected are available for the entire country to serve national mapping requirements. This combination of data allows a more refined classification of populated places on maps that better represents relative importance. Visual importance on maps through scale should derive from more than simply residential population, but also economic importance, though comparison is made to this simpler case. We differentiate a fourth category of GNIS populated place points, essentially "neighborhoods" and related features-which are not incorporated places, CDPs, nor economic places. Populated places in this fourth class do not have federally defined boundaries, necessitating an alternative method for determining hierarchy in label presentation through scale.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051734652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051734652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1559/15230406382100
DO - 10.1559/15230406382100
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80051734652
SN - 1523-0406
VL - 38
SP - 100
EP - 109
JO - Cartography and Geographic Information Science
JF - Cartography and Geographic Information Science
IS - 2
ER -