Estimates of crustal and lithospheric thickness in sub-saharan Africa from S-wave receiver functions

S. E. Hansen, A. A. Nyblade, J. Julià

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Estimates of crustal and lithospheric thickness beneath ten permanent seismic stations in southern, central, and eastern Africa have been obtained from modeling S-wave receiver functions (SRFs). For eight of the examined stations, the Moho depth estimates agree well with estimates from previous studies using P-wave receiver functions (PRFs). For two stations, TSUM and BGCA, previous PRF estimates are not available, and our results provide new constraints on the Moho depth, indicating crustal thicknesses of 35 and 40 km, respectively. SRFs from four stations, BOSA, SUR, FURI, and ATD, display clear S-to-P (Sp) conversions from the lithosphereasthenosphere boundary (LAB), corresponding to lithospheric thicknesses of 155, 140, 80, and 34 km, respectively. As expected, thicker lithosphere is observed beneath the Precambrian Kaapvaal Craton (station BOSA) and the Namaqua-Natal mobile belt (station SUR) and thinner lithosphere is observed beneath the edge of the Ethiopian rift (station FURI) and the Afar Depression (station ATD). The thinner lithosphere beneath the two latter stations is consistent with the transition from continental to oceanic rifting at the Afar triple junction. For the remaining stations, bootstrap error estimates indicate that the Sp conversion from the LAB cannot be well resolved, calling into question interpretations of lithospheric structure in previous SRF studies using data from these same stations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-240
Number of pages12
JournalSouth African Journal of Geology
Volume112
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimates of crustal and lithospheric thickness in sub-saharan Africa from S-wave receiver functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this