TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimates of functional cerebral hemispheric differences in monolingual and bilingual people who stutter
T2 - Visual hemifield paradigm
AU - Kornisch, Myriam
AU - Robb, Michael P.
AU - Jones, Richard D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2017/4/3
Y1 - 2017/4/3
N2 - The relationship between stuttering and bilingualism to functional cerebral hemispheric processing was examined using a visual hemifield paradigm. Eighty native German speakers, half of whom were also proficient speakers of English as a second language (L2), were recruited. The participants were organised into four different groups according to speech status and language ability: 20 monolinguals who stutter, 20 bilinguals who stutter, 20 monolinguals who do not stutter, and 20 bilinguals who do not stutter. All participants completed a task involving selective identification of common objects simultaneously presented to both visual fields. Overall, an LVF advantage was observed across all groups with no significant group differences in regard to hemispheric asymmetry. However, both bilingual groups showed faster reaction times and fewer identification errors than the two monolingual groups. A prevailing finding was that bilingualism seems to offset deficits in executive functioning associated with stuttering. Hence, the results lend support to previous findings implicating the benefits of bilingualism.
AB - The relationship between stuttering and bilingualism to functional cerebral hemispheric processing was examined using a visual hemifield paradigm. Eighty native German speakers, half of whom were also proficient speakers of English as a second language (L2), were recruited. The participants were organised into four different groups according to speech status and language ability: 20 monolinguals who stutter, 20 bilinguals who stutter, 20 monolinguals who do not stutter, and 20 bilinguals who do not stutter. All participants completed a task involving selective identification of common objects simultaneously presented to both visual fields. Overall, an LVF advantage was observed across all groups with no significant group differences in regard to hemispheric asymmetry. However, both bilingual groups showed faster reaction times and fewer identification errors than the two monolingual groups. A prevailing finding was that bilingualism seems to offset deficits in executive functioning associated with stuttering. Hence, the results lend support to previous findings implicating the benefits of bilingualism.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992090849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992090849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699206.2016.1240236
DO - 10.1080/02699206.2016.1240236
M3 - Article
C2 - 27763772
AN - SCOPUS:84992090849
SN - 0269-9206
VL - 31
SP - 251
EP - 265
JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
IS - 4
ER -