Abstract
We analyze posterior distributions of the moving average parameter in the first-order case and sampling distributions of the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator. Sampling distributions “pile up” at unity when the true parameter is near unity; hence if one were to difference such a process, estimates of the moving average component of the resulting series would spuriously tend to indicate that the process was overdifferenced. Flat-prior posterior distributions do not pile up, however, regardless of the parameter’s proximity to unity; hence caution should be taken in dismissing evidence that a series has been overdifferenced.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 311-317 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Business and Economic Statistics |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1993 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Statistics and Probability
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating moving average parameters: Classical pileups and bayesian posteriors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver