"Ethics man" misses mark: Most bioethicists are not thugs

Joshua S. Crites; Rebecca L. Volpe

doi:10.1136/bmj.e6549

"Ethics man" misses mark: Most bioethicists are not thugs

Department of Humanities

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Article number	e6549
Journal	BMJ (Online)
Volume	345
Issue number	7877
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6549
State	Published - Oct 6 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.e6549

Cite this

@article{a05f8f0dcf5e4669abbbd21e7caab496,

title = "{"}Ethics man{"} misses mark: Most bioethicists are not thugs",

author = "Crites, {Joshua S.} and Volpe, {Rebecca L.}",

year = "2012",

month = oct,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.e6549",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "345",

journal = "BMJ (Online)",

issn = "0267-0623",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "7877",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Ethics man" misses mark

T2 - Most bioethicists are not thugs

AU - Crites, Joshua S.

AU - Volpe, Rebecca L.

PY - 2012/10/6

Y1 - 2012/10/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867277229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867277229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.e6549

DO - 10.1136/bmj.e6549

M3 - Letter

C2 - 23033416

AN - SCOPUS:84867277229

SN - 0267-0623

VL - 345

JO - BMJ (Online)

JF - BMJ (Online)

IS - 7877

M1 - e6549

ER -

"Ethics man" misses mark: Most bioethicists are not thugs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this