TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethnic differences in psychological outcomes among people with diabetes
T2 - USA results from the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN2) study
AU - Peyrot, Mark
AU - Egede, Leonard E.
AU - Campos, Carlos
AU - Cannon, Anthony J.
AU - Funnell, Martha M.
AU - Hsu, William C.
AU - Ruggiero, Laurie
AU - Siminerio, Linda M.
AU - Stuckey, Heather L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Informa UK Ltd.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Objective: To assess differences in psychological outcomes as well as risk and protective factors for these outcomes among several USA ethnic groups and identify correlates of these psychological outcomes among adults with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2∗) study. Research design and methods: The core USA DAWN2 sample was supplemented by independent samples of specific ethnic minority groups, yielding a total of 447 White non-Hispanics, 241 African Americans, 194 Hispanics, and 173 Chinese Americans (n=1055). Multivariate analysis examined ethnic differences in psychological outcomes and risk/protective factors (disease, demographic and socioeconomic factors, health status and healthcare access/utilization, subjective burden of diabetes and social support/burden). Separate analyses were performed on each group to determine whether risk/protective factors differed across ethnic groups. Main outcome measures: Psychological outcomes include well-being, quality of life, impact of diabetes on life domains, diabetes distress, and diabetes empowerment. Clinical trial registration: NCT01507116. Results: Ethnic minorities tended to have better psychological outcomes than White non-Hispanics, although their diabetes distress was higher. Levels of most risk and protective factors differed significantly across ethnic groups; adjustment for these factors reduced ethnic group differences in psychological outcomes. Health status and modifiable diabetes-specific risk/protective factors (healthcare access/utilization, subjective diabetes burden, social support/burden) had strong associations with psychological outcomes, especially diabetes distress and empowerment. Numerous interactions between ethnicity and other correlates of psychological outcomes suggest that ethnic groups are differentially sensitive to various risk/protective factors. Potential limitations are the sample sizes and representativeness. Conclusions: Ethnic groups differ in their psychological outcomes. The risk/protective factors for psychological outcomes differ across ethnic groups and different ethnic groups are more/less sensitive to their influence. These findings can aid the development of strategies to overcome the most prominent and influential psychosocial barriers to optimal diabetes care within each ethnic group.
AB - Objective: To assess differences in psychological outcomes as well as risk and protective factors for these outcomes among several USA ethnic groups and identify correlates of these psychological outcomes among adults with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2∗) study. Research design and methods: The core USA DAWN2 sample was supplemented by independent samples of specific ethnic minority groups, yielding a total of 447 White non-Hispanics, 241 African Americans, 194 Hispanics, and 173 Chinese Americans (n=1055). Multivariate analysis examined ethnic differences in psychological outcomes and risk/protective factors (disease, demographic and socioeconomic factors, health status and healthcare access/utilization, subjective burden of diabetes and social support/burden). Separate analyses were performed on each group to determine whether risk/protective factors differed across ethnic groups. Main outcome measures: Psychological outcomes include well-being, quality of life, impact of diabetes on life domains, diabetes distress, and diabetes empowerment. Clinical trial registration: NCT01507116. Results: Ethnic minorities tended to have better psychological outcomes than White non-Hispanics, although their diabetes distress was higher. Levels of most risk and protective factors differed significantly across ethnic groups; adjustment for these factors reduced ethnic group differences in psychological outcomes. Health status and modifiable diabetes-specific risk/protective factors (healthcare access/utilization, subjective diabetes burden, social support/burden) had strong associations with psychological outcomes, especially diabetes distress and empowerment. Numerous interactions between ethnicity and other correlates of psychological outcomes suggest that ethnic groups are differentially sensitive to various risk/protective factors. Potential limitations are the sample sizes and representativeness. Conclusions: Ethnic groups differ in their psychological outcomes. The risk/protective factors for psychological outcomes differ across ethnic groups and different ethnic groups are more/less sensitive to their influence. These findings can aid the development of strategies to overcome the most prominent and influential psychosocial barriers to optimal diabetes care within each ethnic group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908610026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908610026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1185/03007995.2014.947023
DO - 10.1185/03007995.2014.947023
M3 - Article
C2 - 25079662
AN - SCOPUS:84908610026
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 30
SP - 2241
EP - 2254
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 11
ER -