TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethnic inequality in mexican education
AU - Creighton, Mathew J.
AU - Post, David
AU - Park, Hyunjoon
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors appreciate the time and commitment of the editors and anonymous reviewers at Social Forces. An earlier draft of this work was presented at the 2014 Annual Conference of the Population Association of America in Boston, MA. Hyunjoon Park acknowledges support from the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2013S1A3A2055251), funded by the Korean government.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Since the emergence of Mexico's secretariat for public education following the revolution (1910-1920), reducing indigenous inequality in educational mobility has been a state objective. Recently, findings have been mixed, with some finding that indigeneity no longer limits educational mobility and others showing evidence of persistent in equality net of socioeconomic background. We draw from modernization theory and the theory of Maximally Maintained Inequality (MMI) to assess six decades of education policy. Using the Mexican Family Life Survey (n = 88,547), we find that indigenous disadvantage in terms of educational mobility, which marked cohorts immediately after the revolution, shifts to near parity in more recent cohorts. Contrary to what MMI would predict, indigenous disadvantage declines for lower secondary transitions, despite nearly a third of eligible students failing to transition. Rather than a single, targeted policy period, we observe a somewhat monotonic decline in inequality by indigeneity across all levels of schooling, even if saturation has yet to be attained. Modernization theory, rather than MMI, is a more reasonable match for the observed pattern. Although not the case in earlier decades, for recent cohorts we conclude that socioeconomic inequality rather than ethnicity per se has become the main source of indigenous inequality in educational mobility.
AB - Since the emergence of Mexico's secretariat for public education following the revolution (1910-1920), reducing indigenous inequality in educational mobility has been a state objective. Recently, findings have been mixed, with some finding that indigeneity no longer limits educational mobility and others showing evidence of persistent in equality net of socioeconomic background. We draw from modernization theory and the theory of Maximally Maintained Inequality (MMI) to assess six decades of education policy. Using the Mexican Family Life Survey (n = 88,547), we find that indigenous disadvantage in terms of educational mobility, which marked cohorts immediately after the revolution, shifts to near parity in more recent cohorts. Contrary to what MMI would predict, indigenous disadvantage declines for lower secondary transitions, despite nearly a third of eligible students failing to transition. Rather than a single, targeted policy period, we observe a somewhat monotonic decline in inequality by indigeneity across all levels of schooling, even if saturation has yet to be attained. Modernization theory, rather than MMI, is a more reasonable match for the observed pattern. Although not the case in earlier decades, for recent cohorts we conclude that socioeconomic inequality rather than ethnicity per se has become the main source of indigenous inequality in educational mobility.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959859373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959859373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/sf/sov103
DO - 10.1093/sf/sov103
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959859373
SN - 0037-7732
VL - 94
SP - 1187
EP - 1220
JO - Social Forces
JF - Social Forces
IS - 3
M1 - sov103
ER -