Abstract
The distinction of between-person age differences from within-person age changes is necessary for understanding aging-related change processes. Although longitudinal studies are required to address issues relating to within-person change, most studies begin using age-heterogeneous samples and conclude using survival-heterogeneous samples. Given the numerous potential confounds associated with age-heterogeneous samples, careful treatment of between-person age differences is essential to obtain the correct inferences regarding within-person age change. The authors demonstrate how failure to differentiate between-person age effects (and by extension, of survival age or other effects producing sample heterogeneity) will lead to uninterpretable inferences regarding within-person change. The authors recommend that convergence of age differences and age changes be formally evaluated whenever possible.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 45-60 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Research in Human Development |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2010 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating convergence of within-person change and between-person age differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver