TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the Antinociceptive Efficacy of Cannabidiol Alone or in Combination with Morphine Using the Formalin Test in Male and Female Mice
AU - Sepulveda, Diana E.
AU - Morris, Daniel P.
AU - Raup-Konsavage, Wesley M.
AU - Sun, Dongxiao
AU - Vrana, Kent E.
AU - Graziane, Nicholas M.
N1 - Funding Information:
(−)-morphine sulfate pentahydrate was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Drug Supply Program. CBD was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI; Cat. # 90080). CBD-d3 (HPLC standard) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Formalin solution was prepared from 37% formaldehyde stock solution (Cat. # F79; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Funding Information:
This project is supported by the NARSAD Young Investigator Award (27364; NG) and by the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco CURE Funds (NG). The authors have no financial or nonfinancial competing interests to declare. K.E.V. and the Penn State College of Medicine are recipients of research support from PA Options for Wellness, a Pennsylvania-approved medical marijuana clinical registrant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - Introduction: Phytocannabinoids have emerged as a potential alternative treatment option for individuals experiencing persistent pain. However, evidence-based research regarding their clinical utility in both males and females remains incomplete. In addition, it is unknown whether combining readily available cannabinoids with opioids has a synergistic or subadditive effect on pain modulation. To begin to fill this knowledge gap, we investigated the antinociceptive effects of the phytocannabinoid, CBD, either alone or in combination with opioids in male and female C57BL/6J mice. Results: Using the formalin test, our results show that CBD (10 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment evoked antinociception in phase I, but not in phase II, of the formalin test in male mice. However, in female mice, CBD showed no significant antinociceptive effect. In addition, a direct sex comparison showed that CBD evoked a significant increase in nociceptive behaviors in female versus male mice during phase I of the formalin test. Furthermore, we show that CBD (10 mg/kg, i.p.) in combination with low-dose morphine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective at eliciting a synergistic antinociceptive response in both male and female mice. Lastly, consistent with previous literature, we showed that females treated with a relatively higher dose of morphine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) displayed a significant increase in the variability of nociceptive behaviors compared to morphine-treated male mice. Conclusion: Overall, our results suggest that CBD treatment may have beneficial antinociceptive effects during the acute phase of persistent pain, but these effects are more beneficial to males than females. We provide further pre-clinical support that treatments geared toward reducing nociceptive behaviors differentially affect males and females.
AB - Introduction: Phytocannabinoids have emerged as a potential alternative treatment option for individuals experiencing persistent pain. However, evidence-based research regarding their clinical utility in both males and females remains incomplete. In addition, it is unknown whether combining readily available cannabinoids with opioids has a synergistic or subadditive effect on pain modulation. To begin to fill this knowledge gap, we investigated the antinociceptive effects of the phytocannabinoid, CBD, either alone or in combination with opioids in male and female C57BL/6J mice. Results: Using the formalin test, our results show that CBD (10 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment evoked antinociception in phase I, but not in phase II, of the formalin test in male mice. However, in female mice, CBD showed no significant antinociceptive effect. In addition, a direct sex comparison showed that CBD evoked a significant increase in nociceptive behaviors in female versus male mice during phase I of the formalin test. Furthermore, we show that CBD (10 mg/kg, i.p.) in combination with low-dose morphine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective at eliciting a synergistic antinociceptive response in both male and female mice. Lastly, consistent with previous literature, we showed that females treated with a relatively higher dose of morphine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) displayed a significant increase in the variability of nociceptive behaviors compared to morphine-treated male mice. Conclusion: Overall, our results suggest that CBD treatment may have beneficial antinociceptive effects during the acute phase of persistent pain, but these effects are more beneficial to males than females. We provide further pre-clinical support that treatments geared toward reducing nociceptive behaviors differentially affect males and females.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136485962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136485962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/can.2021.0108
DO - 10.1089/can.2021.0108
M3 - Article
C2 - 34846928
AN - SCOPUS:85136485962
SN - 2378-8763
VL - 7
SP - 648
EP - 657
JO - Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
JF - Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
IS - 5
ER -