TY - GEN
T1 - EVALUATION OF MANUFACTURING VARIABILITY ON ADIABATIC EFFECTIVENESS OF TRUE SCALE FILM COOLING
AU - Cannon-Jenkins, Tyler
AU - Lynch, Stephen
AU - Krull, Matthew
AU - Mongillo, Dominic
AU - Prenter, Robin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 by RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney division.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Thermal barrier coating and film cooling are necessary for sustaining material life with turbine firing temperatures exceeding current material capabilities. Utilizing current drilling and coating processes results in manufacturing variability such as blockages and added in-hole roughness. This variability can lead to significant deviations in cooling performance by increasing the likelihood of film detachment and decreasing lateral spreading of film. While film cooling and film hole blockage effects on transonic airfoils are known, manufacturing variability as a result of various drilling and coating processes is not often studied. Avoiding this variability by implementing novel manufacturing processes could result in less variation from design-intent for meter and diffuser sections as well as increased film coverage on the airfoil. In the present study, true-scale film cooling hole coupons with industry relevant gas turbine film hole drilling processes were installed on both the pressure and suction side of an airfoil and tested in a steady transonic linear cascade. Specifically, uncoated, drill-before-coat, and drill-after-coat holes were examined to understand their effects on adiabatic film effectiveness. A foam surface was cast onto the airfoil downstream of the coupons to achieve an adiabatic surface. Using a high-definition infrared camera, spatially-resolved adiabatic film effectiveness was obtained for each coupon at various Mach numbers and freestream turbulence intensities. Drill-after-coat holes increased film effectiveness relative to drill-before-coat holes due to better film attachment and lateral spreading, while drill-before-coat holes had more blockages and misshapen diffuser sections. For all holes, increasing freestream turbulence intensity decreased cooling performance and increased lateral spreading, while increasing Mach number improved cooling performance with little effect on coolant coverage.
AB - Thermal barrier coating and film cooling are necessary for sustaining material life with turbine firing temperatures exceeding current material capabilities. Utilizing current drilling and coating processes results in manufacturing variability such as blockages and added in-hole roughness. This variability can lead to significant deviations in cooling performance by increasing the likelihood of film detachment and decreasing lateral spreading of film. While film cooling and film hole blockage effects on transonic airfoils are known, manufacturing variability as a result of various drilling and coating processes is not often studied. Avoiding this variability by implementing novel manufacturing processes could result in less variation from design-intent for meter and diffuser sections as well as increased film coverage on the airfoil. In the present study, true-scale film cooling hole coupons with industry relevant gas turbine film hole drilling processes were installed on both the pressure and suction side of an airfoil and tested in a steady transonic linear cascade. Specifically, uncoated, drill-before-coat, and drill-after-coat holes were examined to understand their effects on adiabatic film effectiveness. A foam surface was cast onto the airfoil downstream of the coupons to achieve an adiabatic surface. Using a high-definition infrared camera, spatially-resolved adiabatic film effectiveness was obtained for each coupon at various Mach numbers and freestream turbulence intensities. Drill-after-coat holes increased film effectiveness relative to drill-before-coat holes due to better film attachment and lateral spreading, while drill-before-coat holes had more blockages and misshapen diffuser sections. For all holes, increasing freestream turbulence intensity decreased cooling performance and increased lateral spreading, while increasing Mach number improved cooling performance with little effect on coolant coverage.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014748006
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014748006#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1115/GT2025-154100
DO - 10.1115/GT2025-154100
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105014748006
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
BT - Energy Storage; Fans and Blowers; Heat Transfer
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - 70th ASME Turbo Expo 2025: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2025
Y2 - 16 June 2025 through 20 June 2025
ER -