TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of wheat and emmer varieties for artisanal baking, pasta making, and sensory quality
AU - Kissing Kucek, Lisa
AU - Dyck, Elizabeth
AU - Russell, June
AU - Clark, Liz
AU - Hamelman, Jeffrey
AU - Burns-Leader, Sharon
AU - Senders, Stefan
AU - Jones, Jenny
AU - Benscher, David
AU - Davis, Michael
AU - Roth, Greg
AU - Zwinger, Steve
AU - Sorrells, Mark E.
AU - Dawson, J. C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Identifying varieties best suited to local food systems requires a comprehensive understanding of varietal performance from field to fork. After conducting four years of field trials to test which varieties of ancient, heritage, and modern wheat grow best on organically managed land, we screened a subset of varieties for bread, pastry, pasta, and cooked grain quality. The varieties evaluated were three lines of emmer (T. turgidum L. ssp. dicoccum Schrank ex Schübl) and eleven lines of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), including two modern soft wheat varieties, four soft heritage wheat varieties, four hard modern wheat varieties, and one hard heritage wheat variety. A diverse group of bakers, chefs, researchers, and consumers compared varieties for qualities of interest to regional markets. Participants assessed differences in sensory profiles, pasta making ability, and baking quality for sourdough, matzah crackers, yeast bread, and shortbread cookies. In addition to detecting significant differences among varieties for pasta, sourdough, and pastry quality, participants documented variation in texture and flavor for the evaluated products. By demonstrating which varieties perform best in the field, in the bakery, and on our taste buds, these results can support recommendations that strengthen the revival of local grain economies.
AB - Identifying varieties best suited to local food systems requires a comprehensive understanding of varietal performance from field to fork. After conducting four years of field trials to test which varieties of ancient, heritage, and modern wheat grow best on organically managed land, we screened a subset of varieties for bread, pastry, pasta, and cooked grain quality. The varieties evaluated were three lines of emmer (T. turgidum L. ssp. dicoccum Schrank ex Schübl) and eleven lines of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), including two modern soft wheat varieties, four soft heritage wheat varieties, four hard modern wheat varieties, and one hard heritage wheat variety. A diverse group of bakers, chefs, researchers, and consumers compared varieties for qualities of interest to regional markets. Participants assessed differences in sensory profiles, pasta making ability, and baking quality for sourdough, matzah crackers, yeast bread, and shortbread cookies. In addition to detecting significant differences among varieties for pasta, sourdough, and pastry quality, participants documented variation in texture and flavor for the evaluated products. By demonstrating which varieties perform best in the field, in the bakery, and on our taste buds, these results can support recommendations that strengthen the revival of local grain economies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85009889620
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85009889620#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.12.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.12.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85009889620
SN - 0733-5210
VL - 74
SP - 19
EP - 27
JO - Journal of Cereal Science
JF - Journal of Cereal Science
ER -