TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation study of a portable impedance biosensor for detection of avian influenza virus
AU - Wang, Ronghui
AU - Lin, Jianhan
AU - Lassiter, Kentu
AU - Srinivasan, Balaji
AU - Lin, Lin
AU - Lu, Huaguang
AU - Tung, Steve
AU - Hargis, Billy
AU - Bottje, Walter
AU - Berghman, Luc
AU - Li, Yanbin
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA/NRI Project #2008-35204-18662 and USDA/NRI Project #2009-35603-05063).
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Current methods for detection of avian influenza virus (AIV) based on virus culture and RT-PCR are well established, but they are either time consuming or require specialized laboratory facilities and highly trained technicians. A simple, rapid, robust, and reliable test, suitable for use in the field or at the patient's bedside, is urgently needed. In this study, the performance of a newly developed portable impedance biosensor was evaluated by comparison with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) and virus culture for detection of AIV in tracheal and cloacal swab samples collected from experimentally H5N2 AIV infected chickens. The impedance biosensor system was based on a combination of magnetic nanobeads, which were coated with AIV subtype-specific antibody for capture (separation and concentration) of a target virus, and a microfluidic chip with an interdigitated array microelectrode for transfer and detection of target virus, and impedance measurement of the bio-nanobeads and AI virus complexes in a buffer solution. A comparison of results obtained from 59 swab samples using virus culture, impedance biosensor and rRT-PCR methods showed that the impedance biosensor technique was comparable in sensitivity and specificity to rRT-PCR. Detection time for the impedance biosensor is less than 1. h.
AB - Current methods for detection of avian influenza virus (AIV) based on virus culture and RT-PCR are well established, but they are either time consuming or require specialized laboratory facilities and highly trained technicians. A simple, rapid, robust, and reliable test, suitable for use in the field or at the patient's bedside, is urgently needed. In this study, the performance of a newly developed portable impedance biosensor was evaluated by comparison with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) and virus culture for detection of AIV in tracheal and cloacal swab samples collected from experimentally H5N2 AIV infected chickens. The impedance biosensor system was based on a combination of magnetic nanobeads, which were coated with AIV subtype-specific antibody for capture (separation and concentration) of a target virus, and a microfluidic chip with an interdigitated array microelectrode for transfer and detection of target virus, and impedance measurement of the bio-nanobeads and AI virus complexes in a buffer solution. A comparison of results obtained from 59 swab samples using virus culture, impedance biosensor and rRT-PCR methods showed that the impedance biosensor technique was comparable in sensitivity and specificity to rRT-PCR. Detection time for the impedance biosensor is less than 1. h.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80955163659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80955163659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.08.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.08.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 21872621
AN - SCOPUS:80955163659
SN - 0166-0934
VL - 178
SP - 52
EP - 58
JO - Journal of Virological Methods
JF - Journal of Virological Methods
IS - 1-2
ER -