TY - JOUR
T1 - Event timing and age deficits in higher-order sequence learning
AU - Howard, James H.
AU - Howard, Darlene V.
AU - Dennis, Nancy A.
AU - Yankovich, Helen
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grant R37 AG15450 from the National Institute on Aging. We thank, Amy Love, Jennie Engle, Claire Wolan, Gazala Ansari, Kim Epstein and Henry Prempeh for their assistance in data collection and analysis. Chandan Vaidya, Karin Japikse and Selam Negash provided helpful comments. A preliminary report of these findings was presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society meetings in Washington, DC, April 1999.
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - Recent studies have reported age deficits in learning sequences that contain subtle sequential regularities [e.g., Curran (1997) Psychological Research, 60(1-2), 24; D. V. Howard et al. (2004) Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 79; Howard, J. H. Jr, & Howard, D. V. (1997). Psychololgy and Aging, 12(4), 634]. This finding is of potential theoretical interest, but the contribution of sequence event timing to this deficit has not been investigated. This study used an alternating serial reaction time task to examine implicit sequence learning in young adults when event timing mimicked that experienced by older adults in previous research. We varied the response-to-stimulus interval directly in Experiment 1 and indirectly by degrading the stimuli to influence response time in Experiment 2. Results indicate that these "aged" young adults learned the higher-order sequence structure implicitly, but they learned less than young controls and more than old adults on some measures of implicit learning in both experiments. In addition, these two different experimental manipulations produced distinct patterns of deficits despite having nearly identical effects on event sequence timing. These findings suggest that event timing alone cannot explain the age deficits observed in high-order implicit sequence learning.
AB - Recent studies have reported age deficits in learning sequences that contain subtle sequential regularities [e.g., Curran (1997) Psychological Research, 60(1-2), 24; D. V. Howard et al. (2004) Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 79; Howard, J. H. Jr, & Howard, D. V. (1997). Psychololgy and Aging, 12(4), 634]. This finding is of potential theoretical interest, but the contribution of sequence event timing to this deficit has not been investigated. This study used an alternating serial reaction time task to examine implicit sequence learning in young adults when event timing mimicked that experienced by older adults in previous research. We varied the response-to-stimulus interval directly in Experiment 1 and indirectly by degrading the stimuli to influence response time in Experiment 2. Results indicate that these "aged" young adults learned the higher-order sequence structure implicitly, but they learned less than young controls and more than old adults on some measures of implicit learning in both experiments. In addition, these two different experimental manipulations produced distinct patterns of deficits despite having nearly identical effects on event sequence timing. These findings suggest that event timing alone cannot explain the age deficits observed in high-order implicit sequence learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36448988630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36448988630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13825580601186635
DO - 10.1080/13825580601186635
M3 - Article
C2 - 17851987
AN - SCOPUS:36448988630
SN - 1382-5585
VL - 14
SP - 647
EP - 668
JO - Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
JF - Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
IS - 6
ER -