Examining the neural basis of congruent and incongruent configural contexts during associative retrieval

Courtney R. Gerver, Amy A. Overman, Harini J. Babu, Chloe E. Hultman, Nancy A. Dennis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Disrupting the configural context, or relative organization and orientation of paired stimuli, between encoding and retrieval negatively impacts memory. Using univariate and multivariate fMRI analyses, we examined the effect of retaining and manipulating the configural context on neural mechanisms supporting associative retrieval. Behavioral results showed participants had significantly higher hit rates for recollecting pairs in a contextually congruent, versus incongruent, configuration. In addition, contextual congruency between memory phases was a critical determinant to characterizing both the magnitude and patterns of neural activation within visual and parietal cortices. Regions within visual cortices also exhibited higher correlations between patterns of activity at encoding and retrieval when configural context was congruent across memory phases than incongruent. Collectively, these findings shed light on how manipulating configural context between encoding and retrieval affects associative recognition, with changes in the configural context leading to reductions in information transfer and increases in task difficulty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1796-1812
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of cognitive neuroscience
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cognitive Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the neural basis of congruent and incongruent configural contexts during associative retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this