Abstract
Climate change adaptation is largely a local matter, and adaptation planning can benefit from local climate change projections. Such projections are typically generated by accepting climate model outputs in a relatively uncritical way. We argue, based on the IPCC’s treatment of model outputs from the CMIP5 ensemble, that this approach is unwarranted and that subjective expert judgment should play a central role in the provision of local climate change projections intended to support decision-making.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1110-1121 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science