Experts Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning in Adults

  • Maude St-Onge
  • , Kurt Anseeuw
  • , Frank Lee Cantrell
  • , Ian C. Gilchrist
  • , Philippe Hantson
  • , Benoit Bailey
  • , Valéry Lavergne
  • , Sophie Gosselin
  • , William Kerns
  • , Martin Laliberté
  • , Eric J. Lavonas
  • , David N. Juurlink
  • , John Muscedere
  • , Chen Chang Yang
  • , Tasnim Sinuff
  • , Michael Rieder
  • , Bruno Mégarbane

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

124 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To provide a management approach for adults with calcium channel blocker poisoning. Data Sources, Study Selection, and Data Extraction: Following the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument, initial voting statements were constructed based on summaries outlining the evidence, risks, and benefits. Data Synthesis: We recommend 1) for asymptomatic patients, observation and consideration of decontamination following a potentially toxic calcium channel blocker ingestion (1D); 2) as first-line therapies (prioritized based on desired effect), IV calcium (1D), high-dose insulin therapy (1D-2D), and norepinephrine and/or epinephrine (1D). We also suggest dobutamine or epinephrine in the presence of cardiogenic shock (2D) and atropine in the presence of symptomatic bradycardia or conduction disturbance (2D); 3) in patients refractory to the first-line treatments, we suggest incremental doses of high-dose insulin therapy if myocardial dysfunction is present (2D), IV lipid-emulsion therapy (2D), and using a pacemaker in the presence of unstable bradycardia or high-grade arteriovenous block without significant alteration in cardiac inotropism (2D); 4) in patients with refractory shock or who are periarrest, we recommend incremental doses of high-dose insulin (1D) and IV lipid-emulsion therapy (1D) if not already tried. We suggest venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, if available, when refractory shock has a significant cardiogenic component (2D), and using pacemaker in the presence of unstable bradycardia or high-grade arteriovenous block in the absence of myocardial dysfunction (2D) if not already tried; 5) in patients with cardiac arrest, we recommend IV calcium in addition to the standard advanced cardiac life-support (1D), lipid-emulsion therapy (1D), and we suggest venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation if available (2D). Conclusion: We offer recommendations for the stepwise management of calcium channel blocker toxicity. For all interventions, the level of evidence was very low.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e306-e315
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experts Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning in Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this