TY - JOUR
T1 - Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change
T2 - A social science review
AU - Thomas, Kimberley
AU - Hardy, R. Dean
AU - Lazrus, Heather
AU - Mendez, Michael
AU - Orlove, Ben
AU - Rivera-Collazo, Isabel
AU - Roberts, J. Timmons
AU - Rockman, Marcy
AU - Warner, Benjamin P.
AU - Winthrop, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
information Society for American Archaeology; American Sociological Association; American Association of Geographers; American Anthropological Association; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Grant/Award Number: NNX17AG17G; The School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale UniversityThis working group was facilitated by Susan Goodwin (Department of the Interior). Katie Reeves (USGCRP contractor) provided administrative support. Funding for the Social Science Perspectives workshop and follow-on activities was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant NNX17AG17G), the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, the American Anthropological Association, the American Association of Geographers, the American Sociological Association, and the Society for American Archaeology. The School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale University hosted a writing session for this team. We also wish to acknowledge the helpful comments provided during and after the workshop by Chelsea Combest-Friedman, Michael Craghan, Emily Eisenhauer, Stacey Fritz, Anne Grambsch, Holly Hapke, Sam Higuchi, Fen Hunt, Anna Kerttula, Keely Maxwell, Tom McGovern, Andy Miller, Leah Nichols, and John Primo.
Funding Information:
This working group was facilitated by Susan Goodwin (Department of the Interior). Katie Reeves (USGCRP contractor) provided administrative support. Funding for the Social Science Perspectives workshop and follow-on activities was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant NNX17AG17G), the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, the American Anthropological Association, the American Association of Geographers, the American Sociological Association, and the Society for American Archaeology. The School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale University hosted a writing session for this team. We also wish to acknowledge the helpful comments provided during and after the workshop by Chelsea Combest-Friedman, Michael Craghan, Emily Eisenhauer, Stacey Fritz, Anne Grambsch, Holly Hapke, Sam Higuchi, Fen Hunt, Anna Kerttula, Keely Maxwell, Tom McGovern, Andy Miller, Leah Nichols, and John Primo.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - The varied effects of recent extreme weather events around the world exemplify the uneven impacts of climate change on populations, even within relatively small geographic regions. Differential human vulnerability to environmental hazards results from a range of social, economic, historical, and political factors, all of which operate at multiple scales. While adaptation to climate change has been the dominant focus of policy and research agendas, it is essential to ask as well why some communities and peoples are disproportionately exposed to and affected by climate threats. The cases and synthesis presented here are organized around four key themes (resource access, governance, culture, and knowledge), which we approach from four social science fields (cultural anthropology, archaeology, human geography, and sociology). Social scientific approaches to human vulnerability draw vital attention to the root causes of climate change threats and the reasons that people are forced to adapt to them. Because vulnerability is a multidimensional process rather than an unchanging state, a dynamic social approach to vulnerability is most likely to improve mitigation and adaptation planning efforts. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values-Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation.
AB - The varied effects of recent extreme weather events around the world exemplify the uneven impacts of climate change on populations, even within relatively small geographic regions. Differential human vulnerability to environmental hazards results from a range of social, economic, historical, and political factors, all of which operate at multiple scales. While adaptation to climate change has been the dominant focus of policy and research agendas, it is essential to ask as well why some communities and peoples are disproportionately exposed to and affected by climate threats. The cases and synthesis presented here are organized around four key themes (resource access, governance, culture, and knowledge), which we approach from four social science fields (cultural anthropology, archaeology, human geography, and sociology). Social scientific approaches to human vulnerability draw vital attention to the root causes of climate change threats and the reasons that people are forced to adapt to them. Because vulnerability is a multidimensional process rather than an unchanging state, a dynamic social approach to vulnerability is most likely to improve mitigation and adaptation planning efforts. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values-Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058093657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058093657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/wcc.565
DO - 10.1002/wcc.565
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31007726
AN - SCOPUS:85058093657
SN - 1757-7780
VL - 10
JO - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
JF - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
IS - 2
M1 - e565
ER -