TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the learning curve in medical education
T2 - using self-assessment as a measure of learning.
AU - Thompson, Britta M.
AU - Rogers, John C.
N1 - Copyright:
This record is sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: Learning is a complex process that follows predictable patterns. The authors explored whether students' self-assessment of competencies could be used as a measure of learning within medical school. METHOD: Medical students (all grade levels) rated their achievement of competencies at the beginning and end of an academic year. Repeated-measures ANOVA and [eta]2 were used to determine differences. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-three students participated (response rate = 79.3%). Self-assessment ratings between four grade levels were significant (P < .001, [eta]2 = 0.33), with the steepest difference between MS2 and MS3; professionalism ratings remained relatively stable. The largest percent increase within an academic year occurred between MS1 and MS2, with little increase within MS3 and MS4. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' self-assessment ratings of competencies indicated differences between grade levels and during an academic year, following a sigmoidal curve. These results have implications for medical education and indicate the need to develop longitudinal measures to track changes in learning.
AB - BACKGROUND: Learning is a complex process that follows predictable patterns. The authors explored whether students' self-assessment of competencies could be used as a measure of learning within medical school. METHOD: Medical students (all grade levels) rated their achievement of competencies at the beginning and end of an academic year. Repeated-measures ANOVA and [eta]2 were used to determine differences. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-three students participated (response rate = 79.3%). Self-assessment ratings between four grade levels were significant (P < .001, [eta]2 = 0.33), with the steepest difference between MS2 and MS3; professionalism ratings remained relatively stable. The largest percent increase within an academic year occurred between MS1 and MS2, with little increase within MS3 and MS4. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' self-assessment ratings of competencies indicated differences between grade levels and during an academic year, following a sigmoidal curve. These results have implications for medical education and indicate the need to develop longitudinal measures to track changes in learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149174263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149174263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/acm.0b013e318183e5fd
DO - 10.1097/acm.0b013e318183e5fd
M3 - Article
C2 - 18820509
AN - SCOPUS:58149174263
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 83
SP - S86-88
JO - Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
JF - Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
IS - 10 Suppl
ER -