TY - JOUR
T1 - Facilitating fourth-grade students’ written argumentation
T2 - The use of an argumentation graphic organizer
AU - Wei, Liwei
AU - Firetto, Carla M.
AU - Murphy, P. Karen
AU - Li, Mengyi
AU - Greene, Jeffrey A.
AU - Croninger, Rachel M.V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/9/3
Y1 - 2019/9/3
N2 - Literacy instruction in the 21st century must bolster students’ ability to critically process text and craft well-reasoned written argumentation. The authors investigated changes in fourth-grade students’ (N = 28; 15 girls) written argumentation as they used a researcher-developed graphic organizer (i.e., Quality Talk graphic organizer [QTGO]). The authors also examined the extent to which students’ graphic organizer performance predicted their written argumentation and whether such prediction was sustained across genres. Both QTGO responses and written argumentation essays were scored for quantity and quality. Multilevel modeling analyses reveal that (a) both quantity and quality of students’ written argumentation essays statistically significantly improved after students used QTGO and (b) students’ graphic organizer performance seemed to attenuate the effect of genre on their written argumentation for both quantity and quality. Results suggest that QTGO facilitated students’ written argumentation, making it easier for fourth-grade students to write about both narrative and expository texts.
AB - Literacy instruction in the 21st century must bolster students’ ability to critically process text and craft well-reasoned written argumentation. The authors investigated changes in fourth-grade students’ (N = 28; 15 girls) written argumentation as they used a researcher-developed graphic organizer (i.e., Quality Talk graphic organizer [QTGO]). The authors also examined the extent to which students’ graphic organizer performance predicted their written argumentation and whether such prediction was sustained across genres. Both QTGO responses and written argumentation essays were scored for quantity and quality. Multilevel modeling analyses reveal that (a) both quantity and quality of students’ written argumentation essays statistically significantly improved after students used QTGO and (b) students’ graphic organizer performance seemed to attenuate the effect of genre on their written argumentation for both quantity and quality. Results suggest that QTGO facilitated students’ written argumentation, making it easier for fourth-grade students to write about both narrative and expository texts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074298795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074298795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00220671.2019.1654428
DO - 10.1080/00220671.2019.1654428
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074298795
SN - 0022-0671
VL - 112
SP - 627
EP - 639
JO - Journal of Educational Research
JF - Journal of Educational Research
IS - 5
ER -