TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors influencing the adoption of biochar-producing gasifier cookstoves by households in rural Kenya
AU - Gitau, K. J.
AU - Mutune, J.
AU - Sundberg, C.
AU - Mendum, R.
AU - Njenga, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Swedish Research Council, VR, grant No. 2015 03180 and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning grant No. 924-2015-1112 and World Agroforestry. We highly appreciate the active participation and cooperation of households at Kwale without which this work would not have been achieved. The travel support offered to Dr. Ruth Mendum by office of International Programs, College of Agricultural Sciences Penn State University is highly appreciated. We are also thankful to Parmutia Makui of ICRAF for his assistance with statistical analysis. Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute (KIRDI) who manufacture the GASTOV model used in this study. The contribution of all other members of the research team is highly appreciated.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Swedish Research Council , VR, grant No. 2015 03180 and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning grant No. 924-2015-1112 and World Agroforestry . We highly appreciate the active participation and cooperation of households at Kwale without which this work would not have been achieved. The travel support offered to Dr. Ruth Mendum by office of International Programs, College of Agricultural Sciences Penn State University is highly appreciated. We are also thankful to Parmutia Makui of ICRAF for his assistance with statistical analysis. Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute (KIRDI) who manufacture the GASTOV model used in this study. The contribution of all other members of the research team is highly appreciated.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Fuel wood is the main source of cooking and heating energy in developing countries. However, it is combusted in inefficient cookstoves, leading to more fuel use and human health problems resulting from exposure to smoke. Thus new, efficient cooking systems that can address some of these problems are required. This study examined gasifier cookstove use in Kwale County, Kenya, and factors influencing adoption. Gasifier stoves were issued for free to 50 households, which were surveyed after 2–3 months of use. The results showed that the stove was used by 96% of the households at varying frequencies, 40% of them used it almost every day with 4% switching to only using the new stove. All the users appreciated it because it saved fuel, produced less smoke, and produced charcoal to use for either cooking or soil amendment. Compared with the traditional three-stone open fire, the gasifier stove was reported to be easier to clean (98% of respondents), easier to adjust the heat (88%), easier to handle (58%), caused less exposure to heat (96%) and was cleaner for pots and the kitchen (98%). Another reported benefit of the gasifier stove was that it needed no tending ( i. e., adjusting wood and blowing to keep the flames burning). The gasifier stove was mainly used to cook foods that required a short cooking time and many preferred to use it to cook dinner. However, the households encountered some challenges with using the gasifier stoves. For example, fuel preparation, reloading, and lighting were reported as challenges by 42%, 77% and 19%, respectively, of the 83% of households who reported challenges. These challenges could be overcome by improving stove design and by devising innovative ways of cutting fuel into small pieces.
AB - Fuel wood is the main source of cooking and heating energy in developing countries. However, it is combusted in inefficient cookstoves, leading to more fuel use and human health problems resulting from exposure to smoke. Thus new, efficient cooking systems that can address some of these problems are required. This study examined gasifier cookstove use in Kwale County, Kenya, and factors influencing adoption. Gasifier stoves were issued for free to 50 households, which were surveyed after 2–3 months of use. The results showed that the stove was used by 96% of the households at varying frequencies, 40% of them used it almost every day with 4% switching to only using the new stove. All the users appreciated it because it saved fuel, produced less smoke, and produced charcoal to use for either cooking or soil amendment. Compared with the traditional three-stone open fire, the gasifier stove was reported to be easier to clean (98% of respondents), easier to adjust the heat (88%), easier to handle (58%), caused less exposure to heat (96%) and was cleaner for pots and the kitchen (98%). Another reported benefit of the gasifier stove was that it needed no tending ( i. e., adjusting wood and blowing to keep the flames burning). The gasifier stove was mainly used to cook foods that required a short cooking time and many preferred to use it to cook dinner. However, the households encountered some challenges with using the gasifier stoves. For example, fuel preparation, reloading, and lighting were reported as challenges by 42%, 77% and 19%, respectively, of the 83% of households who reported challenges. These challenges could be overcome by improving stove design and by devising innovative ways of cutting fuel into small pieces.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073702763
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073702763#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.esd.2019.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.esd.2019.07.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073702763
SN - 0973-0826
VL - 52
SP - 63
EP - 71
JO - Energy for Sustainable Development
JF - Energy for Sustainable Development
ER -