TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors limiting US public health emergency authority during COVID-19
AU - Zhang, Xue
AU - Warner, Mildred E.
AU - Meredith, Gen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many states in the United States have limited emergency public health authority. These limits could undermine public health efforts and raise concerns about how states and localities will prevent and respond to future public health challenges. We examined which of the 50 US states passed laws to set limits on public health emergency authority in 2021 through 2022, and their relationship to COVID-19 death rates. We explored five government characteristics: COVID-19 policy response, political partisanship (Republican control), legislative professionalism, local government autonomy, and broader non-COVID-19 related preemptions. Results of T-tests and a Generalised Structural Equation Model show that states with unified Republican control had greater odds of limiting emergency public health authority of the state executive, state governor, state health official, and local health officials. Limits of emergency public health authority were associated with a higher COVID-19 death rate. We found that states setting limits on emergency authority are primarily related to politicisation and political competition between state executives/governors and legislatures, rather than pushback against the COVID-19 public health response. Limiting emergency public health authority is less common in states with more professional state legislatures. Structural changes related to party control, legislative professionalism, and local autonomy may facilitate public health authority.
AB - Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many states in the United States have limited emergency public health authority. These limits could undermine public health efforts and raise concerns about how states and localities will prevent and respond to future public health challenges. We examined which of the 50 US states passed laws to set limits on public health emergency authority in 2021 through 2022, and their relationship to COVID-19 death rates. We explored five government characteristics: COVID-19 policy response, political partisanship (Republican control), legislative professionalism, local government autonomy, and broader non-COVID-19 related preemptions. Results of T-tests and a Generalised Structural Equation Model show that states with unified Republican control had greater odds of limiting emergency public health authority of the state executive, state governor, state health official, and local health officials. Limits of emergency public health authority were associated with a higher COVID-19 death rate. We found that states setting limits on emergency authority are primarily related to politicisation and political competition between state executives/governors and legislatures, rather than pushback against the COVID-19 public health response. Limiting emergency public health authority is less common in states with more professional state legislatures. Structural changes related to party control, legislative professionalism, and local autonomy may facilitate public health authority.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165473845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165473845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hpm.3694
DO - 10.1002/hpm.3694
M3 - Article
C2 - 37485544
AN - SCOPUS:85165473845
SN - 0749-6753
VL - 38
SP - 1569
EP - 1582
JO - International Journal of Health Planning and Management
JF - International Journal of Health Planning and Management
IS - 5
ER -