Factors that prevent roughstock rodeo athletes from wearing protective equipment

David S. Ross, Alishia Ferguson, Philip Bosha, Kyle Cassas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Using a cross-sectional survey design, this study sought to determine usage rates and barriers to the use of protective equipment in roughstock athletes. Between 2004 and 2006, amateur, collegiate, and professional roughstock athletes were surveyed using national organizational mailing lists. Findings revealed that during competition, 69% never wore a helmet. Barriers were a negative effect on performance and sport persona. Conversely, 88% always wore a vest. The perception that vest usage was required encouraged roughstock athletes to wear them. Mouthpiece use results were mixed; 58% always used and 21% never used a mouthpiece. Barriers were discomfort and frequent forgetfulness. Reported injury rate was high, with users noting fewer injuries to head and ribs than nonusers, and riders agreed that protective equipment prevented injury to the head, ribs, and mouth. However, equipment usage rates varied widely by type and seemed to be underutilized because the equipment affected performance, was uncomfortable, and "not cowboy."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-346
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent sports medicine reports
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Factors that prevent roughstock rodeo athletes from wearing protective equipment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this