Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Failures of pin removal after in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphyses: A comparison of different pin types

  • Edward Vresilovic
  • , K. P. Spindler
  • , W. W. Robertson
  • , R. S. Davidson
  • , D. S. Drummond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We reviewed 75 pin retrievals after in situ pinning of 35 children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Four types of pins were used. Ten pins in 8 hips could not be removed because of pin breakage or stripping. Our failure rate was significantly related to pin type and size (p < 0.039). As compared with the expected values using the chi-square method of analysis, the noncannulated large steel pins and cannulated steel pin groups had fewer failures (p < 0.001) as compared with the cannulated titanium and noncannulated small steel pin groups. We now avoid using cannulated titanium or noncannulated small pins in treatment of SCFE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)764-768
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failures of pin removal after in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphyses: A comparison of different pin types'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this