TY - JOUR
T1 - Familial classification of the boraginales
AU - Luebert, Federico
AU - Cecchi, Lorenzo
AU - Frohlich, Michael W.
AU - Gottschling, Marc
AU - Guilliams, C. Matt
AU - Hasenstab-Lehman, Kristen E.
AU - Hilger, Hartmut H.
AU - Miller, James S.
AU - Mittelbach, Moritz
AU - Nazaire, Mare
AU - Nepi, Massimo
AU - Nocentini, Daniele
AU - Ober, Dietrich
AU - Olmstead, Richard G.
AU - Selvi, Federico
AU - Simpson, Michael G.
AU - Sutorý, Karel
AU - Valdés, Benito
AU - Walden, Genevieve K.
AU - Weigend, Maximilian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) 2016.
PY - 2016/6/24
Y1 - 2016/6/24
N2 - The Boraginales are now universally accepted as monophyletic and firmly placed in Lamiidae. However, a consensus about familial classification has remained elusive, with some advocating recognition of a single, widely variable family, and others proposing recognition of several distinct families. A consensus classification is proposed here, based on recent molecular phylogenetic studies, morphological characters, and taking nomenclatural stability into consideration. We suggest the recognition of eleven, morphologically well-defined and clearly monophyletic families, namely the Boraginaceae s.str., Codonaceae, Coldeniaceae fam. nov., Cordiaceae, Ehretiaceae, Heliotropiaceae, Hoplestigmataceae, Hydrophyllaceae, Lennoaceae, Namaceae, and Wellstediaceae. Descriptions, synonomy, a taxonomic key, and a list of genera for these eleven families are provided, including the new family Coldeniaceae (monogeneric) and Namaceae (segregated from Hydrophyllaceae and comprising Nama, Eriodictyon, Turricula, and Wigandia), the latter necessitating a revised circumscription of a more morphologically coherent Hydrophyllaceae.
AB - The Boraginales are now universally accepted as monophyletic and firmly placed in Lamiidae. However, a consensus about familial classification has remained elusive, with some advocating recognition of a single, widely variable family, and others proposing recognition of several distinct families. A consensus classification is proposed here, based on recent molecular phylogenetic studies, morphological characters, and taking nomenclatural stability into consideration. We suggest the recognition of eleven, morphologically well-defined and clearly monophyletic families, namely the Boraginaceae s.str., Codonaceae, Coldeniaceae fam. nov., Cordiaceae, Ehretiaceae, Heliotropiaceae, Hoplestigmataceae, Hydrophyllaceae, Lennoaceae, Namaceae, and Wellstediaceae. Descriptions, synonomy, a taxonomic key, and a list of genera for these eleven families are provided, including the new family Coldeniaceae (monogeneric) and Namaceae (segregated from Hydrophyllaceae and comprising Nama, Eriodictyon, Turricula, and Wigandia), the latter necessitating a revised circumscription of a more morphologically coherent Hydrophyllaceae.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977556524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977556524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12705/653.5
DO - 10.12705/653.5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84977556524
SN - 0040-0262
VL - 65
SP - 502
EP - 522
JO - Taxon
JF - Taxon
IS - 3
ER -