TY - GEN
T1 - Farmers' perceptions on the utility of auto-guidance technology to improve operator safety
AU - Bleazard, Thomas
AU - Pate, Michael L.
AU - Lawver, Rebecca G.
AU - Israelsen, Clark
AU - Hatch, Royce
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the variables associated with Northern Utah farmers' adoption of auto-guidance technologies and their perceptions on the utility of auto-guidance technology to improve operator safety. Participants were provided an experiential training session utilizing a simulation of an auto-guidance system. A total of 99 participants attended the training session. A survey was administered to identify auto-guidance technology adoption and farmers' perceptions of the utility of auto-guidance to promote operator safety. Half of the participants in this study (50.8%) indicated using auto-guidance technology in their farming practices. The majority of participants (f = 29, 53%) agreed that auto-guidance systems would assist with increasing an operators' ability to monitor towed equipment. Operator fatigue was the next highest perceived safety benefit from using auto-guidance systems. Results indicated that extension agents and agribusiness professionals in the western United States should refocus their education and marketing to producers regarding auto-guidance technology. Fewer participants of auto-guidance technology also identified using university and Extension professionals as a source of information on auto-guidance. However, users (f = 15, 48.4%) also reported the use the internet as a source of information of auto-guidance technology. Extension professionals may consider improving; their market share and making their programing more realized for these participants. University Extension professionals may also team up with dealers and consultants at crop schools, field days, other Extension events and dealer sponsored events to educate producers about auto-guidance technology.
AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the variables associated with Northern Utah farmers' adoption of auto-guidance technologies and their perceptions on the utility of auto-guidance technology to improve operator safety. Participants were provided an experiential training session utilizing a simulation of an auto-guidance system. A total of 99 participants attended the training session. A survey was administered to identify auto-guidance technology adoption and farmers' perceptions of the utility of auto-guidance to promote operator safety. Half of the participants in this study (50.8%) indicated using auto-guidance technology in their farming practices. The majority of participants (f = 29, 53%) agreed that auto-guidance systems would assist with increasing an operators' ability to monitor towed equipment. Operator fatigue was the next highest perceived safety benefit from using auto-guidance systems. Results indicated that extension agents and agribusiness professionals in the western United States should refocus their education and marketing to producers regarding auto-guidance technology. Fewer participants of auto-guidance technology also identified using university and Extension professionals as a source of information on auto-guidance. However, users (f = 15, 48.4%) also reported the use the internet as a source of information of auto-guidance technology. Extension professionals may consider improving; their market share and making their programing more realized for these participants. University Extension professionals may also team up with dealers and consultants at crop schools, field days, other Extension events and dealer sponsored events to educate producers about auto-guidance technology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009135250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009135250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13031/aim.20162457078
DO - 10.13031/aim.20162457078
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85009135250
T3 - 2016 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2016
BT - 2016 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2016
PB - American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
T2 - 2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting
Y2 - 17 July 2016 through 20 July 2016
ER -