TY - JOUR
T1 - FastSurfer parcellation accuracy after lesion filling in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury
AU - Deutscher, Evelyn
AU - Dennis, Emily
AU - Hillary, Frank G.
AU - Wilde, Elisabeth A.
AU - Esopenko, Carrie
AU - Dobryakova, Ekaterina
AU - Irimia, Andrei
AU - Radwan, Ahmed M.
AU - Imms, Phoebe
AU - Clemente, Adam
AU - Beech, Paul
AU - Burmester, Alex
AU - Caeyenberghs, Karen
AU - Domínguez, D. Juan F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Deutscher, Dennis, Hillary, Wilde, Esopenko, Dobryakova, Irimia, Radwan, Imms, Clemente, Beech, Burmester, Caeyenberghs and Domínguez.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: Focal lesions in T1-weighted (T1-w) magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (ms-TBI) can introduce errors during image processing. We tested whether errors in FastSurfer cortical parcellation could be reduced using lesion filling (virtual brain grafting (VBG)). Methods: T1-w MRIs from 140 healthy controls and 14 ms-TBI patients were shared within the ENIGMA TBI working group. A “ground truth” set of 140 lesion-free images was created by registering 10 healthy controls (HCs) onto each of 14 ms-TBI images. Masks indexing focal lesions (small [38 mm3] unilateral to large [164,291 mm3] bilateral) were projected onto lesion-free images, creating 140 synthetically lesioned images. Lesioned images underwent VBG filling to replace lesioned regions with simulated healthy brain tissue, creating 140 VBG-filled images. To calculate parcellation accuracy, paired sample t-tests of mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and percent volume differences (PVDs) for lesioned and VBG-filled images were compared to lesion-free images. Results: Parcellations from lesioned images (DSC M = 0.93, SD = 0.03; PVD M = −0.40, SD = 1.7) unexpectedly had significantly higher DSCs [t(111) = 19.5, p < 0.001] and lower PVDs [t(111) = 11.3, p < 0.001] than VBG-filled images (DSC M = 0.81, SD = 0.07; PVD M = −9.03, SD = 7.72). Interpretation: Parcellations from lesioned images were more accurate (than VBG-filled images) than lesion-free ground truth images. While likely due to a high frequency of smaller focal lesions in our sample, these results could suggest that FastSurfer parcellation may be robust in the presence of such lesions.
AB - Objective: Focal lesions in T1-weighted (T1-w) magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (ms-TBI) can introduce errors during image processing. We tested whether errors in FastSurfer cortical parcellation could be reduced using lesion filling (virtual brain grafting (VBG)). Methods: T1-w MRIs from 140 healthy controls and 14 ms-TBI patients were shared within the ENIGMA TBI working group. A “ground truth” set of 140 lesion-free images was created by registering 10 healthy controls (HCs) onto each of 14 ms-TBI images. Masks indexing focal lesions (small [38 mm3] unilateral to large [164,291 mm3] bilateral) were projected onto lesion-free images, creating 140 synthetically lesioned images. Lesioned images underwent VBG filling to replace lesioned regions with simulated healthy brain tissue, creating 140 VBG-filled images. To calculate parcellation accuracy, paired sample t-tests of mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and percent volume differences (PVDs) for lesioned and VBG-filled images were compared to lesion-free images. Results: Parcellations from lesioned images (DSC M = 0.93, SD = 0.03; PVD M = −0.40, SD = 1.7) unexpectedly had significantly higher DSCs [t(111) = 19.5, p < 0.001] and lower PVDs [t(111) = 11.3, p < 0.001] than VBG-filled images (DSC M = 0.81, SD = 0.07; PVD M = −9.03, SD = 7.72). Interpretation: Parcellations from lesioned images were more accurate (than VBG-filled images) than lesion-free ground truth images. While likely due to a high frequency of smaller focal lesions in our sample, these results could suggest that FastSurfer parcellation may be robust in the presence of such lesions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025647808
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025647808#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2025.1652385
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2025.1652385
M3 - Article
C2 - 41451415
AN - SCOPUS:105025647808
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
M1 - 1652385
ER -