TY - JOUR
T1 - Field evaluation of entomopathogenic nematodes for the biological control of the annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in golf course turfgrass
AU - McGraw, Benjamin A.
AU - Vittum, Patricia J.
AU - Cowles, Richard S.
AU - Koppenhöfer, Albrecht M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We appreciate the technical assistance of Erica Jimenez, Jennifer Margres, Mohammed Saleh, Eugene Fuzy, and Kathleen Fuzy. This research was supported in part by grants from the US Golf Association, the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America – Chapter Supported Research Program (supporting chapters: GCSA of New Jersey, Long Island GCSA, Keystone AGCS), and the USDA-Northeastern IPM Grant 2007-34103-18418. This is New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication No. D-08-08187-03-09 supported by state funds and Regional Research Funds.
Funding Information:
We appreciate the technical assistance of Erica Jimenez, Jennifer Margres, Mohammed Saleh, Eugene Fuzy, and Kathleen Fuzy. This research was supported in part by grants from the US Golf Association, the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America–Chapter Supported Research Program (supporting chapters: GCSA of New Jersey, Long Island GCSA, Keystone AGCS), and the USDA-Northeastern IPM Grant 2007-34103-18418. This is New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication No. D-08-08187-03-09 supported by state funds and Regional Research Funds.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2010, Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The ability of entomopathogenic nematodes to suppress larval populations of the annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis, was investigated under field conditions over a 3-year period (2006–2008). Combination of nematode species, application rate and timing produced strong numerical yet few statistically significant reductions. Steinernema carpocapsae Weiser, S. feltiae Filipjev, and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar applied at 2.5×109 IJs/ha reduced first generation late instars between 69 and 94% in at least one field trial. Steinernema feltiae provided a high level of control (94%) to low densities (~20 larvae per 0.09 m2), but gave inadequate control for higher densities (24 and 50% suppression). No significant differences were found among treatment timings. However, applications timed to coincide with the peak of larvae entering the soil (fourth instars) generally performed better than applications made prior to (preemptive) or after the majority of the population advanced from the fourth instar. Nematode populations declined sharply between 0 and 14 days after treatment (DAT). Although nematode populations later increased (at 28 DAT), indicating an ability to recycle within hosts in the environment, they were nearly undetectable 56 DAT when the second generation host larvae were present in the soil. Applying commercially available nematode species at standard field rates cannot reliably reduce L. maculicollis immature densities on golf courses, nor will single applications suppress multiple generations. Future research will need to identify application strategies to improve biocontrol consistency.
AB - The ability of entomopathogenic nematodes to suppress larval populations of the annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis, was investigated under field conditions over a 3-year period (2006–2008). Combination of nematode species, application rate and timing produced strong numerical yet few statistically significant reductions. Steinernema carpocapsae Weiser, S. feltiae Filipjev, and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar applied at 2.5×109 IJs/ha reduced first generation late instars between 69 and 94% in at least one field trial. Steinernema feltiae provided a high level of control (94%) to low densities (~20 larvae per 0.09 m2), but gave inadequate control for higher densities (24 and 50% suppression). No significant differences were found among treatment timings. However, applications timed to coincide with the peak of larvae entering the soil (fourth instars) generally performed better than applications made prior to (preemptive) or after the majority of the population advanced from the fourth instar. Nematode populations declined sharply between 0 and 14 days after treatment (DAT). Although nematode populations later increased (at 28 DAT), indicating an ability to recycle within hosts in the environment, they were nearly undetectable 56 DAT when the second generation host larvae were present in the soil. Applying commercially available nematode species at standard field rates cannot reliably reduce L. maculicollis immature densities on golf courses, nor will single applications suppress multiple generations. Future research will need to identify application strategies to improve biocontrol consistency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955682729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955682729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09583150903440658
DO - 10.1080/09583150903440658
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84955682729
SN - 0958-3157
VL - 20
SP - 149
EP - 163
JO - Biocontrol Science and Technology
JF - Biocontrol Science and Technology
IS - 2
ER -