TY - JOUR
T1 - Field testing and numerical investigation of streetscape vehicular anti-ram barriers under vehicular impact using FEM-only and coupled FEM-SPH simulations
AU - Yoo, Tae Kwang
AU - Qiu, Tong
AU - Reese, Lynsey
AU - Rado, Zoltan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - This article presents two field-scale crash tests of Streetscape Vehicle Anti-Ram barrier systems and LS-DYNA simulations to predict the global response of each system under vehicular impact. Tests 1 and 2 consisted of a five-post welded bus stop and a welded bollard, respectively; both were in a steel and concrete composite foundation embedded in compacted American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials aggregate. Test 1 resulted in a P1 rating, where minimal foundation uplift and rotation were observed. Test 2 failed to result in a P1 rating, where significant foundation uplift, rotation, concrete cracking, and large deformation of surrounding soil were observed. For each test, two LS-DYNA models, namely, a finite element method-only model and a hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model, were created to predict the global response of the system. In the finite element method-only model, traditional finite element method approach was used for the entire soil region; in the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model, the near-field soil region was modeled using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach, whereas the far-field soil region was modeled using the finite element method approach. For Test 1, both the finite element method-only model and the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model were able to match the recorded global response of the system. For Test 2, however, the finite element method-only approach was not able to accurately predict the global response of the system; on the other hand, the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach was able to capture the global response including the bollard pullout, soil upheaval, and vehicle override. This research suggests that the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach is more appropriate in simulating the field performance of embedded structures under impact loading when large deformation of the surrounding soil is expected.
AB - This article presents two field-scale crash tests of Streetscape Vehicle Anti-Ram barrier systems and LS-DYNA simulations to predict the global response of each system under vehicular impact. Tests 1 and 2 consisted of a five-post welded bus stop and a welded bollard, respectively; both were in a steel and concrete composite foundation embedded in compacted American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials aggregate. Test 1 resulted in a P1 rating, where minimal foundation uplift and rotation were observed. Test 2 failed to result in a P1 rating, where significant foundation uplift, rotation, concrete cracking, and large deformation of surrounding soil were observed. For each test, two LS-DYNA models, namely, a finite element method-only model and a hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model, were created to predict the global response of the system. In the finite element method-only model, traditional finite element method approach was used for the entire soil region; in the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model, the near-field soil region was modeled using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach, whereas the far-field soil region was modeled using the finite element method approach. For Test 1, both the finite element method-only model and the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model were able to match the recorded global response of the system. For Test 2, however, the finite element method-only approach was not able to accurately predict the global response of the system; on the other hand, the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach was able to capture the global response including the bollard pullout, soil upheaval, and vehicle override. This research suggests that the hybrid finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach is more appropriate in simulating the field performance of embedded structures under impact loading when large deformation of the surrounding soil is expected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985994814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985994814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2041419616652527
DO - 10.1177/2041419616652527
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84985994814
SN - 2041-4196
VL - 7
SP - 213
EP - 231
JO - International Journal of Protective Structures
JF - International Journal of Protective Structures
IS - 2
ER -