TY - JOUR
T1 - Field Trapping of Subsurface Vapor Phase Petroleum Hydrocarbons
AU - Moyer, Ellen E.
AU - Ostendorf, David W.
AU - Kampbell, Don H.
AU - Xie, Yuefeng
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1994/2
Y1 - 1994/2
N2 - Soil gas samples from intact soil cores were collected on adsorbents at a field site, then thermally desorbed and analyzed by laboratory gas chromatography (GC). Vertical concentration profiles of predominant vapor phase petroleum hydrocarbons under ambient conditions were obtained for the zone directly above the capillary fringe. Water and residual phase weathered aviation gasoline were present in this region of the profile. The sampling, trapping, and GC methodology was effective in most respects. Reproducibility, trapping, and desorption efficiency were generally satisfactory, and different sorbent tubes gave similar results. A minor shortcoming of the method occurred with the most volatile compound, 2,3‐dimcthylbutane, which was poorly retained during several weeks of storage lime and was also poorly desorbed. Vapor phase concentrations of predominant hydrocarbon compounds all increased with depth at one sampling location. At a more highly contaminated location, concentrations of highly volatile compounds increased with depth while concentrations of less volatile compounds remained constant or decreased, possibly indicating distillation effects. Scatier in the data was attributed to heterogeneities in water and residual phase distribution.
AB - Soil gas samples from intact soil cores were collected on adsorbents at a field site, then thermally desorbed and analyzed by laboratory gas chromatography (GC). Vertical concentration profiles of predominant vapor phase petroleum hydrocarbons under ambient conditions were obtained for the zone directly above the capillary fringe. Water and residual phase weathered aviation gasoline were present in this region of the profile. The sampling, trapping, and GC methodology was effective in most respects. Reproducibility, trapping, and desorption efficiency were generally satisfactory, and different sorbent tubes gave similar results. A minor shortcoming of the method occurred with the most volatile compound, 2,3‐dimcthylbutane, which was poorly retained during several weeks of storage lime and was also poorly desorbed. Vapor phase concentrations of predominant hydrocarbon compounds all increased with depth at one sampling location. At a more highly contaminated location, concentrations of highly volatile compounds increased with depth while concentrations of less volatile compounds remained constant or decreased, possibly indicating distillation effects. Scatier in the data was attributed to heterogeneities in water and residual phase distribution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027135721&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027135721&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00096.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00096.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0027135721
SN - 1069-3629
VL - 14
SP - 110
EP - 119
JO - Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
JF - Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
IS - 1
ER -