Abstract
Publicly reported hospital performance data have become widely available to health care consumers in recent years. In response to a growing demand for more readily available health care information, various organizations have begun assessing hospital performance. These performance reporting systems have tremendous potential to aid patients, families, and primary care providers in their clinical decision making. This study takes a systematic approach to review the main features of 9 existing hospital rating systems, each of which is described using 9 areas of evaluation. The hospital rating systems included in this study vary widely in scope, methodology, transparency, and presentation of their results. Their results often present conflicting conclusions regarding the performance of the same hospital. This review of hospital rating systems demonstrates how public reporting may add confusion to patients’ health care decision making.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 147-155 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Journal of Medical Quality |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Finding Order in Chaos: A Review of Hospital Ratings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver