TY - JOUR
T1 - Finger enslaving in the dominant and non-dominant hand
AU - Wilhelm, Luke A.
AU - Martin, Joel R.
AU - Latash, Mark L.
AU - Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was in part supported by NIH grants NS-035032 , and AR-048563 .
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - During single-finger force production, the non-instructed fingers unintentionally produce force (finger enslaving). In this study, enslaving effects were compared between the dominant and non-dominant hands. The test consisted of a series of maximum voluntary contractions with different finger combinations. Enslaving matrices were calculated by means of training an artificial neural network. The dominant hand was found to be stronger, but there was found to be no difference between the overall enslaving effects in the dominant and non-dominant hands. There was no correlation between the magnitude of finger enslaving and the performance in such tests as the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, the Grooved Pegboard test, and the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test. Each one of those three tests showed a significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand performances. Eleven subjects were retested after two months, and it was found that enslaving effects did not fluctuate significantly between the two testing sessions. While the dominant and non-dominant hands are involved differently in everyday tasks, e.g. in writing or eating, this practice does not cause significant differences in enslaving between the hands.
AB - During single-finger force production, the non-instructed fingers unintentionally produce force (finger enslaving). In this study, enslaving effects were compared between the dominant and non-dominant hands. The test consisted of a series of maximum voluntary contractions with different finger combinations. Enslaving matrices were calculated by means of training an artificial neural network. The dominant hand was found to be stronger, but there was found to be no difference between the overall enslaving effects in the dominant and non-dominant hands. There was no correlation between the magnitude of finger enslaving and the performance in such tests as the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, the Grooved Pegboard test, and the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test. Each one of those three tests showed a significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand performances. Eleven subjects were retested after two months, and it was found that enslaving effects did not fluctuate significantly between the two testing sessions. While the dominant and non-dominant hands are involved differently in everyday tasks, e.g. in writing or eating, this practice does not cause significant differences in enslaving between the hands.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894421345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894421345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.humov.2013.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.humov.2013.10.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 24360253
AN - SCOPUS:84894421345
SN - 0167-9457
VL - 33
SP - 185
EP - 193
JO - Human Movement Science
JF - Human Movement Science
IS - 1
ER -